Bittersweet Candy Bowl

But I can be funny too! It’s just these people are too lazy to appreciate and comprehend my intelligent humour. Why don’t they like to share in others’ ingenuity and understanding?

yeah but people don’t wan’t to listen to you sing Romio and juliet while drawing artistic versions of letters into a book of funny jokes.
and nobody can one up a boob. ;p(.)(.)

They are not interested in intelagent humer but people geting hit iin the nuts, and geting blown up

we’re lazy!

*blinks*
what? I dont do that. In addition, while I value the content of Shakespeare, I do find his plays a bit lacking in the interest department. The plots and style are nice, now he just needs to add some action, and maybe some evil robots.

Is there any efficient way to change someone? I’m not to worried about time, I’ve waited this long, but I’m a bit starved for results. Perhaps a tip or two that will hopefully guarantee (or as close as possible) that this/these person(s)/people(s) will evolve into more sentient life forms.

edit: I forgot macbeth. That one’s good. The ones they make you read suck.

I still loved macbeth, i played macbeth

then nobody wants to watch you be reasonable.
That, my freind, is somthing that is best done through little blocks of text.
and nobody can one-up a boob ;P(.)(.)

Chang someone? Only if you want to drive them insain can i help. I tryed to help someone and that failed horrably

No.
and its wrong.
and that is my job lark90
You worken my strip boy?
I did it in two pages of text.

Changing someone for the better?

But yes, If I could drive the corrupted ones insane, the others would have no choice but to listen to me, and consequently, to the voice of reason.

And the people I eat lunch with recently started a way of life which they title with my name. So perhaps I can use that to organize them, and in turn spread the word that will reform the universe.
Or maybe I can forget those stupid unrealistic dreams and go jump in a hole.

I said no.
Even if you have the best of intentions and you arent trying to manipulate them into it which would mean that they don’t realy belive in what they are doing then they can be garantyed to take whatever you say in the worst possable manner. that is how it works.
and if you continualy expose them to the situations that led you to your belife then they will hate you and all your ideas will gain a stigma. They will deny what is right in front of them if it means fighting you.
They will eather chaing or they won’t and meddeling just spreads the hate.

to drive insain: just make them think your going to do terrable things to them but never do anythin. The waiting will kill them I had a few people commited that way

and pecoming an organised entity with a name only healps them lable your ideas with their hate.
I am not using sarcasm

I know. I’m tired. I’m hoping for the answer to be different, but I know it’s not.

/depressed.

Here’s a similar philosophical question: Is sympathy for a loveless one an acceptable substitute for love itself?

Humans are the hardest thing to change

there is no way to make people grow in a particular way and there is no way to know if you are right or they are right. There is no truth. Only the illusions handed to us. remember that and use what you have.

@ lark. The Law Of Gravity

Humans are made of meat and weakness. Cut off some meat and the weakness shows. HAHAHAHAHA

No, Sympathy and love are two differnt emotions

no. its second best.
but second best is better than nothing at all.
but nobody wants high doses of sympathy.
or to drown in sympathy.


but love from a pearson who originaly approched you out of sympathy but now has other reasons is love
thats awsome jeark

I know for a fact that if i can talk to people one on one for an extended period of time, I can get them to understand and adopt, in part at least, my personal doctrines. But there’s never time. Never enough time to make any lasting effects.

If I could only save time in a bottle, or something…

you can catch time in a text box.

now orgasm

^
I’d love to continue this. It’s getting late for me, and I stil haven’t done any of my work. I really have to go.

and your words will stay here.
and wene tomarow comes we will read them.
and you can add to them at any time.
your text is being made at one time but being read by afew people at different times.
your argument dose not need to be prodused all at the same time.
you can add to it over and over.
your time is being captured and reprodused.
now orgasm

I am way ahead of you.

hit and miss.
sorry, you missed.









@ larkbellow
details man details

“facepalm”

Eh, details, who needs them

I wasn’t aiming at anything.

Not today anyway.

bs jerk you were aiming for the funnys

right then.
time for a rerail
any comments on catching time in a text box?

Sigmund Freud was a funny guy apparently. He had a joke in a book of his that said, “A town had a local pastor and a two atheist. It so happened that the atheist was also the town insurance agent. Now, the town atheist was dying, and he asked for the town pastor to visit him on his death bed. No one could believe it! So, the pastor went to the man, and all night they argued about God, and all through the morning of the next day too. Finally, in the night of the second day, the pastor stumbled out of the room. They looked in, and the town atheist had died. And the had died an atheist, but the pastor was fully insured!”
That is some good stuff.
EDIT: Oh hey, a new page with a completely different topic of discussion. Excuse me while I slap my palm against my face.

Nope.

How about something having to do with quantum entanglement?

Nah, too complicated. Let’s try something else. Does anyone want to know where Jerk has been recently?

do you mean to say that insurance is easyer to argue than god is?

Oh Megan, you whore.

Could the theoretical experiment of one Erwin Schrodinger help accomplish this feat?
@Magical
It was a joke Sigmund Freud allegedly made. Hell if I know anything other than it’s funny.

Did they let you bring her ice cream?

hahahahahahahahaha!!!!
that is the perfact charicter(guy with hat) from the perfact sight to be jerk!
also I guess my idea goes undesputed then.
untill such a time as somone desputes me I assume i am correct.

Huh, what idea Dirt?

read above.



shouldn’t you be mock ignorance ninja?
you made a joke about it

I refuse. I’ve done too much back-reading today.

fine
then read forward
and words will stay here.
and wene tomarow comes we will read them.
and you can add to them at any time.
your text is being made at one time but being read by afew people at different times.
your argument dose not need to be prodused all at the same time.
you can add to it over and over.
your time is being captured and reprodused.
you should have been stubborn ninja or lazy ninja

He didn’t read that all those activities were under the name “Megan.” I assume this is because English is not his first language or his mother drank heavily while he was in the womb.

but megan is only mentioned three times on this page.
my ctrl + f says so

Three times now.
EDIT: OH YOU RASCAL.

what?
actualy I got to it right befor you posted

Ninja was suggesting that someone track me in general, or perhaps that I have hurt myself sexually. Believe me, if I had you would all know it.

Dirt suggested that something on that page linked to my personality specifically. Since his grasp on English is weak at best, Ninja has no idea what he said. It’s like you start typing and the miscarried fetus of the English language hobbles out, takes a breath and dies on this very page.

Also something about text boxes that no one gives a shit about.

Two problems with your idea, Dirt Box:

1) You can only add to your post if it is your most recent and was posted within ten minutes

2) Time is an arbitrary creation that we use to help sort out the sequence of events. It doesn’t even have the courtesy to remain constant.

@Jerk: So, how was Meagan when you went to visit her?

only because you said that.
sombody might have bothered to get it but now that’s out the window.

edit
^^^^^^see! see!
and I ment that you wouldn’t have to have your arguments in one chunk because DR klaus was complaining about not having enough time in an argument to convinse people of anything.
and he said “if only I could catch time in a bottle or somthing.”
I ment that you don’t have to use a block of time to argue with a text box and you don’t have to re-explain stuff to new people it they will read.

Vincy, you been drinking?

@ Ninja: I haven’t seen her, much less talked to her, in months. But generally speak, pleasant to be around as long as her boyfriend is doing something else, otherwise her tongue is halfway to his stomach and I don’t know where to look.

@ Lark: Not really. I’ve been trying to conserve it, I guess…but yeah, I should get on that.

The answer is yes, Lark. But the real question is has be drinking recently. He might just be hungover and grumpy.