If you're too lazy to read an article about it here's the pictures:
The five eared cat, Luntya:
And the four-eared cat, Luntik:
Well? What do you think? I actually think that they're kinda pretty, especially Luntik.
Five-Eared cat!
- CatTrooper
- Member
This is what I'm talking about: http://blogs.catster...of-a-new-breed/
If you're too lazy to read an article about it here's the pictures:
The five eared cat, Luntya:
And the four-eared cat, Luntik:
Well? What do you think? I actually think that they're kinda pretty, especially Luntik.
If you're too lazy to read an article about it here's the pictures:
The five eared cat, Luntya:
And the four-eared cat, Luntik:
Well? What do you think? I actually think that they're kinda pretty, especially Luntik.
- #1
- 07 April 2011 - 03:47 PM
I blame the Republicans.
- #2
- 07 April 2011 - 04:05 PM
- CatTrooper
- Member
Sorry for the mix up. Apparently the gray cat in the bottom photo is not Luntik but Yoda, a cat from Chicago who also has 4 ears. Look up Luntik, he was on the news and he's cuter than Yoda.
- #5
- 07 April 2011 - 05:25 PM
- Smash Genesis
- Member
I don't care how many ears they have, those cats are adorable. 
- #13
- 07 April 2011 - 11:34 PM
Yawn seen it.
Cats with wings are the real thing now a days.
Cats with wings are the real thing now a days.
This post has been edited by Rawrdinosaur: 08 April 2011 - 12:51 AM
- #14
- 08 April 2011 - 12:49 AM
- Treeless Druid
- Member
Yay! this is what happens when toolkit genes go screwy ^_^
- #15
- 08 April 2011 - 01:32 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned 
Considering the mutations, it is kind of cool to think about cats gaining the force before us. "Hauntings" also knowen as "the cat came back" but he stayed kind of hidden.
- #21
- 08 April 2011 - 06:33 AM
- Carcharocles
- BCI Member
If I'm not mistaken, most cat fancy organizations refuse to recognize the "munchkin breed" for this exact same reason--it's a mutation that shouldn't be codified into a breed. This guy may succeed in getting a large number of multi-eared cats, but he's going to have a hard time getting them to actually be recognized as a breed.
Why isn't there a "Meh" or "I don't care" on the poll?
Why isn't there a "Meh" or "I don't care" on the poll?
- #23
- 08 April 2011 - 12:43 PM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
Carcharocles, on 08 April 2011 - 12:43 PM, said:
If I'm not mistaken, most cat fancy organizations refuse to recognize the "munchkin breed" for this exact same reason--it's a mutation that shouldn't be codified into a breed. This guy may succeed in getting a large number of multi-eared cats, but he's going to have a hard time getting them to actually be recognized as a breed.
Why isn't there a "Meh" or "I don't care" on the poll?
Why isn't there a "Meh" or "I don't care" on the poll?
Because if you don't care about cats on the internet, 4-chan will find you.
ILB, on 08 April 2011 - 03:00 PM, said:
... I do not like this in the least. 
Why?
- #25
- 09 April 2011 - 04:15 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
That thing is deformed, why would you want to breed imperfection on purpose?
- #26
- 09 April 2011 - 04:48 PM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
Really? I think they are cool and that part of the reason that you don't like it is that that is not what you are used to seeing in a cat and it makes you think of the "cute and cuddly" critter as "strange and unusual but still the same in most ways".
You cannot argue the breeding of inperfection without supporting the master race.
Quote
inperfection
You cannot argue the breeding of inperfection without supporting the master race.
- #28
- 09 April 2011 - 10:06 PM
- Carcharocles
- BCI Member
matty_batty0, on 09 April 2011 - 04:48 PM, said:
That thing is deformed, why would you want to breed imperfection on purpose?
Perfection/imperfection is completely subjective. This argument can be applied against long haired cats and any cat without distinct tabby markings.
The issue here is you are breeding a feature that is probably going to cause significant health problems. In the past, mutations like this have lead to breeds like the Persian, who have long fur and a flat face, but these mutations are not beneficial to the animal and often cause major problems (Persians are known for horrible dental issues, and on the dog side, the Dachsund is well known for spine problems that can and do lead to paralysis.) In the past, these issues wouldn't have been thought of, but the current trend has shifted away from this entirely to the point where many fanciers and breeding organizations refuse to acknowledge new breeds that exhibit these features.
This post has been edited by Carcharocles: 09 April 2011 - 10:16 PM
- #29
- 09 April 2011 - 10:15 PM
- ILB
- secretly a man
Member
Quote
Really? I think they are cool and that part of the reason that you don't like it is that that is not what you are used to seeing in a cat and it makes you think of the "cute and cuddly" critter as "strange and unusual but still the same in most ways".
No, that is not it at all.
- #31
- 09 April 2011 - 11:50 PM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
Maybe I would be able to guess better if you didn't use words like "just" in your explanations of opinions.
Either way, there is little way to argue against opinions on a matter such as "cuteness".
I think it's awsome. You think it's creepy or something(I still don't know). Everybody happy.
Either way, there is little way to argue against opinions on a matter such as "cuteness".
I think it's awsome. You think it's creepy or something(I still don't know). Everybody happy.
- #32
- 10 April 2011 - 12:17 AM
I think as long as it can be proved that the ears are only aesthetic, and hold no severe medical problems[Hearing problems first come to mind, because of the inactive ears blocking off the active ears] for the cats, then this is completely legitimate, fairly cute[depending on ear placement], and extremely cool.
- #33
- 10 April 2011 - 04:56 AM
- (nameless)
- *heavy sigh*
Member 
the amazing five-earred cat(s) seem quite popular.
- #34
- 10 April 2011 - 04:58 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
If you really have an issue with their health, there is a solution.
Breed a race of over 5000 five and four eard cats and then let them loose into a harsh environment.
Breed a race of over 5000 five and four eard cats and then let them loose into a harsh environment.
- #35
- 10 April 2011 - 05:12 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
Other genetic mutations in the past doesn't make this alright, besides they were of a different scale. Cats have fur, breeding them with long fur is just altering one of their characteristics they already have. Cats with extra ears are different, you are adding something new to the animal as apposed to altering something. It would be fair enough to say this is breeding imperfection into the race isn't it? I mean cats (and almost every other animal on Earth) have been genetically strengthened throughout all of history, the weakest traits are lost and the strongest are kept, the result is two eared animals, to suddenly come in and try to alter the breed in such a major way just seems too much like playing god to me, especially when we are doing it just because some people think it looks different.
This post has been edited by matty_batty0: 10 April 2011 - 08:09 AM
- #36
- 10 April 2011 - 08:08 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
matty_batty0, on 10 April 2011 - 08:08 AM, said:
Other genetic mutations in the past doesn't make this alright, besides they were of a different scale. Cats have fur, breeding them with long fur is just altering one of their characteristics they already have. Cats with extra ears are different, you are adding something new to the animal as apposed to altering something. It would be fair enough to say this is breeding imperfection into the race isn't it? I mean cats (and almost every other animal on Earth) have been genetically strengthened throughout all of history, the weakest traits are lost and the strongest are kept, the result is two eared animals, to suddenly come in and try to alter the breed in such a major way just seems too much like playing god to me, especially when we are doing it just because some people think it looks different.
Quote
just because some people think it looks different.
It does look diferent.
Quote
Cats have fur, breeding them with long fur is just altering one of their characteristics they already have.
Cats have ears, breeding them with more ears is just altering one of their characteristics they already have.
Quote
seems too much like playing god to me
This is new how exactly?
- #37
- 10 April 2011 - 08:36 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
Quote
Cats have ears, breeding them with more ears is just altering one of their characteristics they already have.
Altering there ears would be changing the ears they already have, such as making them pointy. Adding ears is adding ears.
Quote
Quote
seems too much like playing god to me
This is new how exactly?
Just because it isn't new doesn't make it alright. Besides, like I said, there are different levels of playing god.
- #38
- 10 April 2011 - 08:44 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
matty_batty0, on 10 April 2011 - 08:44 AM, said:
Quote
Cats have ears, breeding them with more ears is just altering one of their characteristics they already have.
Altering there ears would be changing the ears they already have, such as making them pointy. Adding ears is adding ears.
Altering there hair would be changing the hair they already have, such as making i green. Adding hair is adding hair.
- #39
- 10 April 2011 - 08:46 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
It is merely lengthening hair 
Besides, if I am wrong, having a few extra hairs is nothing compared to extra ears, extra ears are comparable to having an extra leg.
Besides, if I am wrong, having a few extra hairs is nothing compared to extra ears, extra ears are comparable to having an extra leg.
This post has been edited by matty_batty0: 10 April 2011 - 08:51 AM
- #40
- 10 April 2011 - 08:49 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
A genetic difference is a genetic diference and that is what seperates a fish from my left nut.
This post has been edited by Craft aids: 10 April 2011 - 08:53 AM
- #41
- 10 April 2011 - 08:51 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
Haha fair enough, at the end of the day though it all comes down to what level of weird each individual is willing to accept.
This post has been edited by matty_batty0: 10 April 2011 - 08:58 AM
- #42
- 10 April 2011 - 08:57 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
Almost.
you are forgeting one thing.
weird /wɪərd/ Show Spelled
[weerd] Show IPA
adjective, -er, -est, noun
–adjective
1. involving or suggesting the supernatural; unearthly or uncanny
2.(omited because it used the word weird in it's own definition)
3. Archaic . concerned with or controlling fate or destiny.
We would use definition one but the argument for that is just to easy and it does not seem to be the definition you are using.
Real quick, it is on earth and therefore can not be unearthly.
Anyway, you seem to be using a definiton for weird that is closer to "not what I am used to seeing". You are judging a life's right to live based on "That is just the way it is dones" logic. Either way, that is what I covered in my earlyer exchainge with ilb.
you are forgeting one thing.
weird /wɪərd/ Show Spelled
[weerd] Show IPA
adjective, -er, -est, noun
–adjective
1. involving or suggesting the supernatural; unearthly or uncanny
2.(omited because it used the word weird in it's own definition)
3. Archaic . concerned with or controlling fate or destiny.
We would use definition one but the argument for that is just to easy and it does not seem to be the definition you are using.
Real quick, it is on earth and therefore can not be unearthly.
Anyway, you seem to be using a definiton for weird that is closer to "not what I am used to seeing". You are judging a life's right to live based on "That is just the way it is dones" logic. Either way, that is what I covered in my earlyer exchainge with ilb.
- #43
- 10 April 2011 - 09:09 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
And here I was fearing that I might appear argumentative in a lot of my post 
No matter, you are wrong to try and argue that point though. For starters, unearthly could be used to describe it since the natural cat from Earth only has two ears (As well as almost every other creature on Earth which has ears), making it seem like something not from this Earth.
Secondly, your definitions are biased, There are plenty of definitions which support how I used it, Let me show you just one I found:
Weird -informal very strange; bizarre:
eg. "a weird coincidence" "all sorts of weird and wonderful characters"
It is completely fair to use weird similar to "abnormal" or "strange"
No matter, you are wrong to try and argue that point though. For starters, unearthly could be used to describe it since the natural cat from Earth only has two ears (As well as almost every other creature on Earth which has ears), making it seem like something not from this Earth.
Secondly, your definitions are biased, There are plenty of definitions which support how I used it, Let me show you just one I found:
Weird -informal very strange; bizarre:
eg. "a weird coincidence" "all sorts of weird and wonderful characters"
It is completely fair to use weird similar to "abnormal" or "strange"
This post has been edited by matty_batty0: 10 April 2011 - 09:33 AM
- #44
- 10 April 2011 - 09:32 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
My definitions were nott biased. I did not select the definition but instead just grabbed the first on I saw. They may have been benificial though.
There it is. "abnormal". You said it yourself. You don't like it because it is not the way you think of a cat being.
and as for argumentativeness, I never got that consept. It there is a point that has not been argued, the arguers have not done their jobs yet and this unexpplored point could chainge the result of the argument.
There it is. "abnormal". You said it yourself. You don't like it because it is not the way you think of a cat being.
and as for argumentativeness, I never got that consept. It there is a point that has not been argued, the arguers have not done their jobs yet and this unexpplored point could chainge the result of the argument.
- #45
- 10 April 2011 - 09:40 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
Yes that is fair enough to not back down from arguing points which have not yet been argued, but did you really have to attack my use of the word "weird"? The use of it was completely justified, besides, everyone here knew exactly what I meant by it.
Yes, I do think it is abnormal, which is why I called it weird.
Yes, I do think it is abnormal, which is why I called it weird.
- #46
- 10 April 2011 - 09:44 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
Ok, looking back, we have actualy gone far off track. The original argument was about the idea of a genetic "imperfection".
This idea supports the idea that there is a wrong and a right to genetic codes. However, "abnormality" is a totaly seperate issue that you seem to be treating like the same thing.
So then, do you think that a mutation from the more regularly exerted sets of genetic code is an imperfection? This would be the place where we should have started.
This idea supports the idea that there is a wrong and a right to genetic codes. However, "abnormality" is a totaly seperate issue that you seem to be treating like the same thing.
So then, do you think that a mutation from the more regularly exerted sets of genetic code is an imperfection? This would be the place where we should have started.
This post has been edited by Craft aids: 10 April 2011 - 10:05 AM
- #47
- 10 April 2011 - 09:56 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
You really want to start again? I almost hope you are trolling. But sure, I got time to waste.
Cats are the way they are (minus a few alterations by humans) because they evolved to be that way through natural selection, to breed in a trait that would of died out adds weakness.
Quote
Cats (and almost every other animal on Earth) have been genetically strengthened throughout all of history, the weakest traits are lost and the strongest are kept, the result is two eared animals
Cats are the way they are (minus a few alterations by humans) because they evolved to be that way through natural selection, to breed in a trait that would of died out adds weakness.
This post has been edited by matty_batty0: 10 April 2011 - 10:14 AM
- #48
- 10 April 2011 - 10:12 AM
- Craft aids
- That doesn't sound like a rape. That sounds like suprise sex
Banned
I might agree.
However, there are no four eard cat fossils.
Oh wait, neither of us knows that.
Currently, the ears have no perpose.
This may very well be because it is a new or at leas a largly unused trait.
According to your logic, if we were to breed a race and then let them lose in a variety of harsh environments and wait 1000 years, that would validate the existance of whatever cats were left however, the current cats have not been proven and are frivolous and creating life is not the time to be frivolous right?
However, there are no four eard cat fossils.
Oh wait, neither of us knows that.
Currently, the ears have no perpose.
This may very well be because it is a new or at leas a largly unused trait.
According to your logic, if we were to breed a race and then let them lose in a variety of harsh environments and wait 1000 years, that would validate the existance of whatever cats were left however, the current cats have not been proven and are frivolous and creating life is not the time to be frivolous right?
- #49
- 10 April 2011 - 10:18 AM
- matty_batty0
- Member
I am not saying that current cats are perfect, I am saying the current cats are the closest things we have to perfect. For these two cats to be found with 4/5 ears in the tiny amount of time which is one lifetime almost guarantees that throughout the huge time of history other cats would have been born with unusual amounts of ears. The fact that more of these cats don't exist in modern times proves that it is an unfavorable trait.
This post has been edited by matty_batty0: 10 April 2011 - 10:57 AM
- #50
- 10 April 2011 - 10:34 AM