Harry Potter
- #51
- 18 July 2011 - 03:54 PM
- #52
- 18 July 2011 - 04:05 PM
- #53
- 18 July 2011 - 08:05 PM
ILB, on 18 July 2011 - 03:54 PM, said:
I dunno, The ability to sheild is dependent on reaction time.
Bullets fly fast. Very fast.
- #54
- 18 July 2011 - 09:33 PM
- #55
- 18 July 2011 - 11:08 PM
- #56
- 19 July 2011 - 12:10 AM
- #57
- 19 July 2011 - 12:12 AM
- #58
- 19 July 2011 - 01:31 AM
- #59
- 19 July 2011 - 01:44 AM
- #60
- 19 July 2011 - 01:50 AM
Also Fiendfyre or similar magical means, which are way simpler than a venom coating for a weapon you would have to bring there anyway. The point is, it would be unnecessarily difficult to do it that way, just like it is needlessly hard to bash flies with sledgehammers when we have fly swatters.
- #61
- 19 July 2011 - 01:55 AM
And why doesn't someone just use a time turner to go back and kill young v-mort before he grows up? Like maybe a terminator? They're immune to the killing curse, aren't they? since they're robots?
- #62
- 19 July 2011 - 01:59 AM
- #63
- 19 July 2011 - 02:34 AM
- #64
- 19 July 2011 - 02:40 AM
Quote
If you are going to introduce a MacGuffin such as that, you may as well say that The One Ring can be destroyed by putting it in your tea water. ^_^
- #65
- 19 July 2011 - 02:40 AM
Plus, protego can be set up in less than a second, as seen in the close fight scenes in the latest movie. Example, the fight between Molly Weasly and Bellatrix Lestrange. Who both aren't the best of witches. Bellatrix is good, but not Harry-Voldermort-Snape good.
On another note:
Voldermorts body was twisted to fit his power, surely no bullet could kill him when his body isn't even human anymore?
Plus eight horcruxes [Including the secret one], no waaaay in hell.
...
I feel like a fanatic DX
- #66
- 19 July 2011 - 02:44 AM
- #67
- 19 July 2011 - 02:52 AM
This post has been edited by anonymous2: 19 July 2011 - 05:02 AM
- #68
- 19 July 2011 - 05:00 AM
- #69
- 19 July 2011 - 05:36 AM
Also, to anyone who has seen the last movie, how accurate is it to the book?
- #70
- 19 July 2011 - 06:36 AM
Arnas Baubkus, on 19 July 2011 - 06:36 AM, said:
Also, to anyone who has seen the last movie, how accurate is it to the book?
It was faily accuret for a movie actually.
- #71
- 19 July 2011 - 07:50 AM
ILB, on 19 July 2011 - 02:40 AM, said:
Quote
If you are going to introduce a MacGuffin such as that, you may as well say that The One Ring can be destroyed by putting it in your tea water. ^_^
IF the tea-water were hot enough to melt the ring.
Skylar, on 19 July 2011 - 02:44 AM, said:
Plus, protego can be set up in less than a second, as seen in the close fight scenes in the latest movie. Example, the fight between Molly Weasly and Bellatrix Lestrange. Who both aren't the best of witches. Bellatrix is good, but not Harry-Voldermort-Snape good.
On another note:
Voldermorts body was twisted to fit his power, surely no bullet could kill him when his body isn't even human anymore?
Plus eight horcruxes [Including the secret one], no waaaay in hell.
...
I feel like a fanatic DX
The sword of gryffindor (did I spell that right?) simply absorbed the power of the venom into it's metal, since it was goblin-made (or something). Who's to say they could not have forged several bullets using similar methods? As for the death eaters willing to take a bullet, That's why you would use a sniper rifle. To kill them from far enough away that they can't aim a curse at you, or take the bullet.
Or a SEAL-team 6 style raid might work as well. The problem then is that the people going into the compound are at high risk. But not higher than say, raiding Bin Laden's compound. (The killing curse, like a gun, requires pointing an object accurately at someone to kill them.)
This post has been edited by Johnny Hurricane: 19 July 2011 - 03:33 PM
- #72
- 19 July 2011 - 03:26 PM
Johnny Hurricane said:
You do realize that water vaporizes at a mere 100°C, right? ^_^
- #73
- 19 July 2011 - 03:30 PM
- #74
- 19 July 2011 - 03:32 PM
wacko, on 19 July 2011 - 03:30 PM, said:
Johnny Hurricane said:
You do realize that water vaporizes at a mere 100°C, right? ^_^
You do realize that depends on pressure, right? ^_^
- #75
- 19 July 2011 - 03:59 PM
- #76
- 19 July 2011 - 04:05 PM
- #77
- 19 July 2011 - 04:13 PM
- #78
- 19 July 2011 - 04:35 PM
"Guys! That Snape is a spy!"-The Death Eaters
- #79
- 19 July 2011 - 08:47 PM
Leaving_a_Comment, on 19 July 2011 - 04:05 PM, said:
Draco's face when he got hugged by Voldemort was the best.
- #80
- 19 July 2011 - 09:27 PM
Johnny Hurricane, on 19 July 2011 - 03:26 PM, said:
The sword of gryffindor (did I spell that right?) simply absorbed the power of the venom into it's metal, since it was goblin-made (or something). Who's to say they could not have forged several bullets using similar methods? As for the death eaters willing to take a bullet, That's why you would use a sniper rifle. To kill them from far enough away that they can't aim a curse at you, or take the bullet.
Or a SEAL-team 6 style raid might work as well. The problem then is that the people going into the compound are at high risk. But not higher than say, raiding Bin Laden's compound. (The killing curse, like a gun, requires pointing an object accurately at someone to kill them.)
You like being an ignorant fuckwit, don't you? I mean, really, that's the only reason I could think of for you to continually ignore everything else but your little cannon-fodder wet dream while you jerk off to the latest flashpoint conflict.
Who's to say they wouldn't have forged bullets is magic is more powerful and adaptable, end of story. Magic has no defined range, in the last book and film spells cast from your simple wand are used to fuck Hogwarts up, and it's bubble shield. Wizards are everything from physicians to mobile artillery platforms that run on food.
Aslo, you don't need to specify which SEAL team would do the job. That's just plain retarded in terms of logistics anyway. As for actually trying to eliminate Voldermort via current SOPs of special operations troops, you are asking the impossible. You don't face off to a guy who can kill you with a flick of his wand and a thought without even aiming with assualt rifles and submachine guns.
And as ILB said, Horcruxes. He is immortal unless all of his Horcruxes are destroyed, because his soul flees his mortal shell and hello Philosopher's Stone once again.
- #81
- 19 July 2011 - 10:28 PM
- #82
- 19 July 2011 - 10:32 PM
You're not a troll, Johnny. You're genuinely thick as twenty-two planks stacked on top of each other.
- #83
- 19 July 2011 - 10:34 PM
SushiJaguar, on 19 July 2011 - 10:28 PM, said:
You like being an ignorant fuckwit, don't you? I mean, really, that's the only reason I could think of for you to continually ignore everything else but your little cannon-fodder wet dream while you jerk off to the latest flashpoint conflict.
Yep. Definitely a calm, reasonable argument.
- #84
- 19 July 2011 - 10:36 PM
- #85
- 20 July 2011 - 01:30 AM
SushiJaguar, on 20 July 2011 - 01:30 AM, said:
Clearly, either you or I aren't picking up on the sarcasm here. But we're getting off topic.
Wouldn't it be great if someone drew gryffindor-mike?
- #86
- 20 July 2011 - 01:46 AM
Johnny Hurricane, on 20 July 2011 - 01:46 AM, said:
He could have no less than three dicks in his butthole and he still wouldn't be more gay than what you just suggested.
- #87
- 20 July 2011 - 02:07 AM
- #88
- 20 July 2011 - 02:35 AM
- #89
- 20 July 2011 - 06:15 AM
Skylar, on 19 July 2011 - 07:50 AM, said:
While I do agree with you that the movie was fairly ACCURATE to the book it definitely could've done better without making the movie too long or anything like that. Especially compared to the rest of the movies which have been way more accurate than these last two movies.
This post has been edited by keninja86: 20 July 2011 - 06:27 AM
- #90
- 20 July 2011 - 06:26 AM
Johnny Hurricane, on 19 July 2011 - 01:59 AM, said:
What the hell is up with people who read a modern day magic story or a time travel story and start screaming about "let's go back and grab guns, problem solved!" I've seen this argument so many times and it's usually a product of "I don't know what the hell I'm talking about, but I'll say it anyway."
Really, if GUNS were so superior to magic you'd think killing spells would have gone out of fashion with the invention of the rifle cartridge.
This post has been edited by Carcharocles: 20 July 2011 - 11:39 AM
- #91
- 20 July 2011 - 11:38 AM
- #92
- 20 July 2011 - 02:37 PM
- #93
- 21 July 2011 - 02:18 AM
- #94
- 21 July 2011 - 02:27 AM
- #95
- 21 July 2011 - 12:51 PM
Avada Kedavra comes from the ancient Sanskrit phrase literally translated: "From life, death."
The opposite of that is Abra Kadabra which means: "From death, life."
So if someone used Abra Kadabra, if we're thinking about the translation of the words, could it bring the person back to life?
(Never read the books, but saw the movies.)
- #96
- 21 July 2011 - 05:26 PM
"Waah! WAAAAHH! Cry some more!"
"I thought we would be fighting MEN! Who sends babies to fight me?"
"Run, run, coward! I'm coming for you!"
etc.
And would an Uber make them invulnerable to the killing curse?
- #97
- 21 July 2011 - 05:34 PM
i saw the last film on opening night, in 3d
tonight i will go again, but i am going to see it in the IMAX, i am very excited
i hope i don't cry as much as i did last time
- #98
- 21 July 2011 - 10:57 PM
Ven, on 21 July 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:
Avada Kedavra comes from the ancient Sanskrit phrase literally translated: "From life, death."
The opposite of that is Abra Kadabra which means: "From death, life."
So if someone used Abra Kadabra, if we're thinking about the translation of the words, could it bring the person back to life?
(Never read the books, but saw the movies.)
If you read the books, you'd know that restoring a life is not only a forbidden magic, but also goes against the principles of magic. In the series they do explain the things which magic cannot do, such as making food out of nothing. You can make food appear, but it still comes from somewhere.
- #99
- 22 July 2011 - 06:11 AM
- #100
- 22 July 2011 - 06:52 AM












