Burst leaderboard ad
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Superbowl XLVI, Football and other Sports

So yeah decided to make a thread for the upcoming football season (American Football).

I just wan't to hear everybody's Superbowl XLVI predictions, maybe their favorite teams, and who you think is going to the play offs.

Me personally I like the Raiders I know they won't make it to the Superbowl but I think they just might make it to the play offs I really don't care as long as they beat the chargers.


So let's hear everybody else's opinion. Oh yeah you could talk about other sports but my main focus is football.

This post has been edited by ThatOneDudeBro: 28 July 2011 - 01:08 AM

  • #1

I thought football was canceled this year, or was that last year. >_<
  • #2

I am the only person in this entire forum who has opinions on American sports other than "they boring lol."
  • #3

Nope, Lockout ended brah. I have always been a Brownie. It's tough, but I think Tom Heckert, Pat Shurmur, and Mike Holmgren can do something special with free-agent tradings coming up. They already proved their draft pick prowess. Who knows. They probably won't make the playoffs though being in the same division as the Ravens and Steelers, whom are so stacked.

I predict the Packers, Eagles or Steelers (to my dismay) will be top favorites for the next Superbowl. The Patriots need their WR's to step it up for Tom Brady if they are going to compete. The Charger's are cursed and just crap out early in the playoffs. Aaron Rodgers has evolved into something special for the Packers, so I would pick them to repeat as Superbowl champions this year.

Go Browns! Go Cardinals!
  • #4

I completely agree with your last paragraph. The Pats have a great QB but the WRs gotta step up and make things happen. I really can't wait to see the Steelers defensive play because my football teams defense is "supposedly" used by the Steelers but I guess we'll see when the season starts. I'm already looking forward to the Chargers crappy seasons so I could talk shit at school. I live in SD so you know how it is.
  • #5

The Raiders were actually pretty surprising last year, now that I think of it. It's amazing what can happen after you drop the NFL's worst number 1 draft pick ever. *cough* JaMarcus slob *cough*

If they play more consistent this year, they will go far. They seemed hot and cold last year. Like one game they post like 40+ points. Then the next they get shut-out or something. Basically, how the Browns were in 2007 when they narrowly missed the playoffs with a 10-6 record.
  • #6

I know what you mean they should've a lot sooner he was such a Failure but last year they did pretty good with Jason Campbell hopefully they can just keep in the game and play with all they got.

Posted Image

This post has been edited by ThatOneDudeBro: 28 July 2011 - 01:41 AM

  • #7

I must admit, though, I am a spiteful Big Ten College Football fan. So to see SEC's overrated quarterbacks struggle/fail at the professional level gives me bittersweet candy bowl satisfaction. (i.e. Tim Tebow and perhaps Cam Newton).

But you know what? I feel for the Panthers, so I guess my support for them to get better than being 1-10 outweighs my selfish hatred for the SEC.

This post has been edited by Purin: 28 July 2011 - 01:46 AM

  • #8

Yeah I think Cam Newton is good but the team he is going to won't help him get better.

We're the only ones interested in Football wow. What about lacrosse any lacrosse fans out there? Blue Devils all the way!
  • #9

  • TheX400096
  • OKAY! THAT IS IT! I"M TAKING THIS DOWN!!
    Member
I'm from Massachusetts, so Pats FTW. 8-)
  • #10

My brother plays lacrosse for North Texas. So yeah.

I don't think we're going to have any idea of who might and might not go to the next super bowl until the dynamics are set. Ensembles that worked once may not work against new defensive combinations, and the only thing that will interest me really is what they attempt to make the talent they have more cohesive. Who do I want? Green Bay or San Diego are my favorites to watch. I'd be a faggot if I didn't back Dallas to some extent because, fuck, you have to root for your hometown; but I could live without a decent football team this season since I'm still on a joy-high from the Mavericks beating Miami.

View PostTheX400096, on 28 July 2011 - 02:48 AM, said:

I'm from Massachusetts, so Pats FTW. 8-)

Your coach is a cheater and your rings are a lie.
  • #11

  • TheX400096
  • OKAY! THAT IS IT! I"M TAKING THIS DOWN!!
    Member

View PostJerk, on 28 July 2011 - 02:49 AM, said:

My brother plays lacrosse for North Texas. So yeah.

I don't think we're going to have any idea of who might and might not go to the next super bowl until the dynamics are set. Ensembles that worked once may not work against new defensive combinations, and the only thing that will interest me really is what they attempt to make the talent they have more cohesive. Who do I want? Green Bay or San Diego are my favorites to watch. I'd be a faggot if I didn't back Dallas to some extent because, fuck, you have to root for your hometown; but I could live without a decent football team this season since I'm still on a joy-high from the Mavericks beating Miami.

View PostTheX400096, on 28 July 2011 - 02:48 AM, said:

I'm from Massachusetts, so Pats FTW. 8-)

Your coach is a cheater and your rings are a lie.


Just some stupid scandal, so shaddup. >:( >:O

This post has been edited by TheX400096: 28 July 2011 - 02:51 AM

  • #12

I'm probably, like, the only one that likes volleyball here. XD
  • #13

View PostTheX400096, on 28 July 2011 - 02:50 AM, said:

Just some stupid scandal, so shaddup. >:( >:O

The New England Cheatriots. :D

View PostDMLD96, on 28 July 2011 - 02:53 AM, said:

I'm probably, like, the only one that likes volleyball here. XD

Alone, with the lights off, no.
  • #14

  • TheX400096
  • OKAY! THAT IS IT! I"M TAKING THIS DOWN!!
    Member

View PostJerk, on 28 July 2011 - 02:55 AM, said:

View PostTheX400096, on 28 July 2011 - 02:50 AM, said:

Just some stupid scandal, so shaddup. >:( >:O

The New England Cheatriots. :D


We're also home to the ass-kicking Celtics. So take that, Jerk.
  • #15

View PostJerk, on 28 July 2011 - 02:55 AM, said:

View PostTheX400096, on 28 July 2011 - 02:50 AM, said:

Just some stupid scandal, so shaddup. >:( >:O

The New England Cheatriots. :D

View PostDMLD96, on 28 July 2011 - 02:53 AM, said:

I'm probably, like, the only one that likes volleyball here. XD

Alone, with the lights off, no.

I pray that means what I think it means. XD
  • #16

View PostTheX400096, on 28 July 2011 - 02:57 AM, said:

We're also home to the ass-kicking Celtics. So take that, Jerk.

They're alright. I have no opinion of them. They haven't really been a consistent court presence in awhile.
  • #17

@ Jerk really well what position does he play?

I do agree with you there hasn't been enough information to really make any good predictions but they're still welcome.
It's nice to see some more people on this thread and I don't like volleyball. Mostly because a lax teammate left to plat\y Volleyball so yeah. :nope:

This post has been edited by ThatOneDudeBro: 28 July 2011 - 03:07 AM

  • #18

View PostThatOneDudeBro, on 28 July 2011 - 03:07 AM, said:

It's nice to see some more people on this thread and I don't like volleyball. Mostly because a lax teammate left to plat\y Volleyball so yeah. :nope:

Yeah, you do have to find the right people to play with, but then it's fun! The problem that I have with volleyball, though, is that I'm usually doing all the work, but I don't mind. It's still fun! 8-D
  • #19

@Jerk: As a Cleveland sportsfan I was, of course, rooting for the Dallas Cavericks.~

View PostThatOneDudeBro, on 28 July 2011 - 02:20 AM, said:

We're the only ones interested in Football wow.


Yeah, and here I thought I was required to like ponies and sonic in order to have any sort of conversation on here that is unrelated to bcb.

This post has been edited by Purin: 28 July 2011 - 03:34 AM

  • #20

  • wacko
  • Knows more about BCB than Taeshi
    Member
Given that the sports I follow are Canadian football and hockey, I don't expect to be doing much commenting in this thread. Still, kudos for actually suggesting a decent Recess topic.
  • #21

Football is football. It's just that when you are discussing Canadian sports, you might have to present a little background information along side.
  • #22

View PostPurin, on 28 July 2011 - 03:21 AM, said:

@Jerk: As a Cleveland sportsfan I was, of course, rooting for the Dallas Cavericks.~

For one moment, Dallas actually had "America's Team."
  • #23

  • wacko
  • Knows more about BCB than Taeshi
    Member
Sure, here's some background: 3 downs, 12 men, bigger field, singles, no fair catch, more motion before the snap permitted.
  • #24

View Postwacko, on 28 July 2011 - 04:15 AM, said:

Sure, here's some background: 3 downs, 12 men, bigger field, singles, no fair catch, more motion before the snap permitted.

Hmm, sounds Canadian. ;)
  • #25

Another rule: all players must be half the body mass of the average American League player. :D
  • #26

  • wacko
  • Knows more about BCB than Taeshi
    Member
Are we talking football or baseball? :D
  • #27

Our local team (The Chiefs) has a tendency to ignore preseason, do insanely well for the first four or five games of regular season, and then quickly become one of the worst teams in the NFL.

I'd honestly rather go next door to Kauffman Stadium and watch the Royals. To bad both stadiums are hellishly overpriced.

This post has been edited by Carcharocles: 28 July 2011 - 04:34 PM

  • #28

Meh. Not much of an NFL guy. Love football, play it, but more College. I like the NBA a lot though
  • #29

View PostJChurch13, on 28 July 2011 - 06:47 PM, said:

Meh. Not much of an NFL guy. Love football, play it, but more College. I like the NBA a lot though

I usually watch NFL for the rivalry games same goes for college even though college football is a lil more fun to watch because they actually take risks with new plays and not punting all the time on 4th down. Yeah I would much rather be playing football than watching it but it's good to watch after practice or during off season.

This post has been edited by ThatOneDudeBro: 29 July 2011 - 12:50 AM

  • #30

View PostCarcharocles, on 28 July 2011 - 04:33 PM, said:

Our local team (The Chiefs) has a tendency to ignore preseason, do insanely well for the first four or five games of regular season, and then quickly become one of the worst teams in the NFL.


The Chiefs are at the brink of becoming a powerhouse. If Matt Cassel becomes more consistent and the GM signs another deep threat that can take the defensive pressure off Dwayne Bowe, they will have a very explosive offense. I'm not sure what is up with their defense though. I don't even know what type of defense they run (3-4, 4-3, nickel, dime...). Whatever it is, it doesn't work too well, as was seen in their wildcard playoff game last year against the Ravens.


Dallas is a mystery to me. Tony Romo is awful in my opinion. He might as well be the next Derek Anderson or that 2nd string Cardinals quarterback (Leinhart I think), who gets cut from the team during preseason camp. They did make their second half of last season somewhat respectable, so who knows if they will continue on that high.
  • #31

You know what I hate? When one team wins and someone has to be a little shit and say, "Well, so-and-so won, but the other guy had the better team." If they had the better team, they would've won when it mattered. That's what it means to have a good team.
  • #32

View PostJerk, on 29 July 2011 - 06:30 AM, said:

You know what I hate? When one team wins and someone has to be a little shit and say, "Well, so-and-so won, but the other guy had the better team." If they had the better team, they would've won when it mattered. That's what it means to have a good team.

Yeah... :/ But it's a, "No shit, Sherlock" when a team wins. Great, a guy who spends the most money on players and buys the best players wins the game! :smirk:

It's like playing Bill Laimbeer's Combat Basketball, 'cept there's a chance that the shittier team can win. 8-)

This post has been edited by DMLD96: 29 July 2011 - 07:27 AM

  • #33

View PostPurin, on 29 July 2011 - 02:11 AM, said:


The Chiefs are at the brink of becoming a powerhouse. If Matt Cassel becomes more consistent and the GM signs another deep threat that can take the defensive pressure off Dwayne Bowe, they will have a very explosive offense. I'm not sure what is up with their defense though. I don't even know what type of defense they run (3-4, 4-3, nickel, dime...). Whatever it is, it doesn't work too well, as was seen in their wildcard playoff game last year against the Ravens.


We also majorly suffer from Chronic Choke syndrome. I've seen games where we SHOULD HAVE WON where some puny, weak little excuse for a team (like, bottom 3) rips off our nuts and hands them to us in a gift basket. Our real problem as I see it, is two fold--our players panic when something goes wrong, and we have too few good players being backed up by a crapload of mediocre players, which makes the right injury at the right time a game killer.

This post has been edited by Carcharocles: 29 July 2011 - 11:33 AM

  • #34

I am the only one that enjoys it when a team that would seem statistically worse wins? (Screw you Steelers' defenders (the people who try to make excuses to make the team not look as bad), Packers won and you can't deny that! 8-D )

This post has been edited by DMLD96: 29 July 2011 - 01:33 PM

  • #35

@DMLD: I think most people enjoy 'upset' victories. Nothing brings me more joy than to see the Browns beat the Steelers, which as of late is now always considered an upset.


@Carcharocles: Cleveland and Kansas City are very much alike, aren't they? Remember when the Indians and Royals were duking it out for the first month of the season as the best 2 teams in the entire league? Where are they now? Indians are falling out of contention against Detroit, and the Royals have become recurrent bottom-dwellers in the standings...
  • #36

The Redskins are going to suck as usual, but I'll still watch them.

The one thing about Redskinds, is that when we win, were all f***ing ecstatic because its so rare.
  • #37

I predict the next Superbowl will have a shittier half-time show than the last one. "But how, how on Earth could they fuck it up worse than the Black Eyed Peas?". I'll tell you how; Justin Bieber.

But really, who gives a flying fuck about half-time shows?

This post has been edited by ChewySmokey: 29 July 2011 - 07:05 PM

  • #38

  • wacko
  • Knows more about BCB than Taeshi
    Member
The Black Eyed Peas were also the half-time show at the 2005 Grey Cup game. :D
  • #39

View Postwacko, on 29 July 2011 - 07:19 PM, said:

The Black Eyed Peas were also the half-time show at the 2005 Grey Cup game. :D

wouldn't know, I don't watch half-time shows, I just so happened to be in the other room when the Super Bowl was on :P
  • #40

I'm rooting for the Eagles. (Well because I'm a Philly fan and I praticaly live near Philly too. So yea.)
  • #41

Here we go Brownies, here we go! Wooh Wooh!
  • #42

Rangers going to the World Series for the second year in a row.

God damn. If they win this, 2011 will have been the best year for Dallas sports ever.

I still haven't come down from putting King James in his place.
  • #43

View PostCarcharocles, on 29 July 2011 - 11:32 AM, said:

View PostPurin, on 29 July 2011 - 02:11 AM, said:


The Chiefs are at the brink of becoming a powerhouse. If Matt Cassel becomes more consistent and the GM signs another deep threat that can take the defensive pressure off Dwayne Bowe, they will have a very explosive offense. I'm not sure what is up with their defense though. I don't even know what type of defense they run (3-4, 4-3, nickel, dime...). Whatever it is, it doesn't work too well, as was seen in their wildcard playoff game last year against the Ravens.


We also majorly suffer from Chronic Choke syndrome. I've seen games where we SHOULD HAVE WON where some puny, weak little excuse for a team (like, bottom 3) rips off our nuts and hands them to us in a gift basket. Our real problem as I see it, is two fold--our players panic when something goes wrong, and we have too few good players being backed up by a crapload of mediocre players, which makes the right injury at the right time a game killer.



Chronic choke Syndrome to Terminal Choke syndrome. We were a decent team last year. This year, we still have our key players, but it feels like the blooper reels are running. To top it off, there are times where it almost seems like Matt Cassel has forgotten which team he's playing for. We're also very, very far from becoming a powerhouse now; we're that spider in the toilet bowl that's been flushed, fighting in futility to keep from being sucked down.

Which makes dealing with my mom (a Chiefs fan) and a friend ours named Jennifer (a Raiders fan) extremely unbearable.

This post has been edited by Carcharocles: 16 October 2011 - 07:55 PM

  • #44

@Carcharocles: I have Matt Cassell as my fantasy back-up QB. I would get more points if I played an empty quarterback spot rather than Matt Cassel lolololz.

@Jerk: This should be Texas' year for WS. Cardinals are on fire right now though. I think you'd rather verse them over the Brewers since Milwaukee is so hard to beat at home.

Also, the new Lebron James McDonald's commercial makes me smile.
  • #45

Holy shit. What I said earlier about the Chiefs? Well, against the Raiders yesterday they made me eat my words with a side of crow.

A twenty-eight to nothing shutout victory, helped in part by the Raider's complete and total lack of discipline on the field. We are making a comeback. Let's hope it sticks.

Edit: so my mom and our friend Jennifer made a bet on both Raiders games. Whichever team loses, the one supporting the losing team wears the other team's colors as facepaint the following Tuesday. I've told my mom to take my camera, because I want to see the look on Jennifer's face while it's covered in Red and Gold.

This post has been edited by Carcharocles: 24 October 2011 - 02:00 PM

  • #46

DEREK. FUCKING. HOLLAND.

Game three was humiliating, but this kid pretty much won game four single-handedly.
  • #47

This world series will be one for the ages. I forsee a winner-take-all game 7.

This post has been edited by Purin: 26 October 2011 - 02:34 AM

  • #48

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users