This post has been edited by Backrubs: 04 December 2010 - 06:18 AM
Shippers unite! (Against the other group of shippers) Hey, listen!
- #252
- 04 December 2010 - 12:28 PM
- #253
- 04 December 2010 - 02:55 PM
- #254
- 04 December 2010 - 03:05 PM
either that or time travel.
- #255
- 04 December 2010 - 03:21 PM
And time travel is also not eligible; I am not the same as I was but two days ago.
- #256
- 04 December 2010 - 03:25 PM
- #257
- 04 December 2010 - 03:59 PM
- #258
- 04 December 2010 - 04:25 PM
This post has been edited by Mister Nikel: 04 December 2010 - 05:50 PM
- #259
- 04 December 2010 - 05:48 PM
If you are talking about a universe that is exactly the same as ours, then... Well, other universes might exist, but I personally doubt that. However, the theories on multiple universes almost unequivocally state that no two of them are the same; if one were so alike ours, then they would be this universe. It is the same as having two persons that are unlike - if they were alike, they would literally be the same person. ^_^
- #260
- 04 December 2010 - 06:00 PM
Infinite universes/dimensions exist, so surely that one must. Meaning that their exists a dimension where McCain is a lead and Paulo's dad has breasts and Mike X Lucy has existed from the start but with Lucy cheating on Mike with Jessica, Jasmine, and Sandy and it's all canon.
We call this Dimension O(rgy)?
- #261
- 04 December 2010 - 06:04 PM
Also another theory states that there is an infinite number of universes which means that there is an infinite number of universes that mimic ours in every way.
- #262
- 04 December 2010 - 06:05 PM
Quote
Yes, but "infinite" still does not mean "repeated". I know about the theory that infinite universes exist, but I doubt it is true - this is metaphysics, and we have no way of proving or disproving their existence. That said, if our (possibly endless) universe does not contain two different human beings that are truly alike, then it is unreasonable to think that an infinite amount of universes would contain two that are similar, but separated. Think of it in terms of numbers - no matter how infinite they become, there is still only one of them that is 1, or 19, or 300.
And dimensions are still different from locations, I must say. A parallel dimension would actually be less similar to ours than a random one - two parallel lines will never cross, merely run in the same (or exactly opposite) directions. And if we consider the normal theory of dimensions (1st is length, 2nd is width, 3rd is height, 4th incorporates time), then no thing such as a parallel dimension to ours could exist. ^_^
- #263
- 04 December 2010 - 06:18 PM
- #264
- 04 December 2010 - 06:27 PM
- #265
- 04 December 2010 - 06:43 PM
As for the clone thing, a physical clone would be easy to achieve. If you wanted to double check it it might get tedious, but you could. As for a mental clone, the clonee would have to have every neuron in his brain monitored for his entire life and then have those neurons fired in the mind of the clone in the same sequence for the same amount of time. Barring the use of time manipulation/stasis fields, you would end up with a perfect replica of yourself at half your age.
As for the universe thing, well, first off, dimension is a misnomer as Mister Nikel used it, but this happens all the time. For future reference, alternate universe is what you mean. And you could just go to a similar enough universe and find a similar enough you that he/she would essentially be a clone.
This post has been edited by Scotch: 04 December 2010 - 07:31 PM
- #266
- 04 December 2010 - 07:31 PM
- #267
- 04 December 2010 - 07:37 PM
This post has been edited by Scotch: 04 December 2010 - 08:29 PM
- #268
- 04 December 2010 - 08:29 PM
- #269
- 04 December 2010 - 08:56 PM
- #270
- 04 December 2010 - 09:03 PM
I am interested in another Wicked Facts, though. The details are not my particular field, though, so I will leave that up to you. ^_^
- #271
- 04 December 2010 - 09:13 PM
- #272
- 06 December 2010 - 02:33 AM
ILB, on 04 December 2010 - 06:18 PM, said:
Quote
Yes, but "infinite" still does not mean "repeated". I know about the theory that infinite universes exist, but I doubt it is true - this is metaphysics, and we have no way of proving or disproving their existence. That said, if our (possibly endless) universe does not contain two different human beings that are truly alike, then it is unreasonable to think that an infinite amount of universes would contain two that are similar, but separated. Think of it in terms of numbers - no matter how infinite they become, there is still only one of them that is 1, or 19, or 300.
And dimensions are still different from locations, I must say. A parallel dimension would actually be less similar to ours than a random one - two parallel lines will never cross, merely run in the same (or exactly opposite) directions. And if we consider the normal theory of dimensions (1st is length, 2nd is width, 3rd is height, 4th incorporates time), then no thing such as a parallel dimension to ours could exist. ^_^
- #273
- 06 December 2010 - 04:17 AM
Quote
Oh, quite. I have proven myself to have this view, through word or action, a multiplex of times.
- #274
- 06 December 2010 - 12:42 PM
In other words, according to some theories, every thing that ever could have happened has happened in one world or another. Unfortunately, once two worlds split, they can never interact again- so there's still no making out with oneself in the real world.
- #275
- 07 December 2010 - 02:12 AM
Heh, i just read this in another comic, it's to funny to let go
By the way, the many worlds postulate is kinda bullshit. No serious physicist accepts it.
This post has been edited by Migrant: 07 December 2010 - 04:36 AM
- #276
- 07 December 2010 - 04:33 AM
This post has been edited by Scotch: 07 December 2010 - 08:46 AM
- #277
- 07 December 2010 - 08:45 AM
I am Trev the lurker. Fear me, for i see all, and comment rarely.
- #278
- 07 December 2010 - 09:52 AM
Quote
Oh, I am aware of that aspect. However, my claim is that I am not the same now that I was only ten minutes ago, because I have experienced new things and observed new objects and thought new thoughts. It is obvious, in the world of genetics, that environment has a profound (although we do not know how profound) effect on how people turn out. So when the world constantly changes, all people change with it - every single split second. I will not go as far as to postulate that the universe is reborn all the time, but it is not the same it was only a few seconds ago. New people have come into it, old people have left it, new actions have been performed, events that have not occurred before suddenly have. ^_^
- #279
- 07 December 2010 - 02:20 PM
Susan, on 26 November 2010 - 08:48 PM, said:
I also support PauloxJasmine, AbbeyxDaisy, and SuexMcCain.
...Are there really any other couples to support that don't involve Mike? It seems like this comic's relationships are pretty sorted out.
[/captainobviousmoment]
- #280
- 08 December 2010 - 06:02 AM
- #281
- 08 December 2010 - 12:06 PM
i can't get over this one.
although i would be sad if daisy and abbey broke up and daisy would get bosnian again.
and jazz is kinda good for Paulo too,they have fun,which is nice.
i would be o.k with daisy braking up with abbey and hooked up with Tess.
oh yeah...
- #282
- 14 December 2010 - 11:15 AM
Paulo and Sue!!!
- #283
- 14 December 2010 - 12:28 PM
I dont see it.
- #284
- 14 December 2010 - 08:34 PM
I thought MikexLucy was cute for awhile, but after some time I personally believe that Lucy just naturally clicks better with Paulo. He's a decent guy, and in my opinion better for Lucy than Mike ever will be.
- #285
- 15 December 2010 - 05:20 AM
Quote
Well, it is somewhat far-fetched. Draixen supports that one, though. ^_^
- #286
- 15 December 2010 - 10:39 PM
- #287
- 15 December 2010 - 10:41 PM
- #288
- 15 December 2010 - 11:38 PM
- #289
- 16 December 2010 - 08:09 PM
- #290
- 16 December 2010 - 08:22 PM
and
- #291
- 17 December 2010 - 01:52 AM
Quote
I do think it sounds like a funny end; nervous Michael with stoic and silent Amaya.
I found a possible code on the About page, by the way. Lucy is right above Paulo, and that means they will end up together. Daisy stands above Abraham, and they are a couple already. Unfortunately, this also brings up Michael and David. ^_^
- #292
- 17 December 2010 - 01:00 PM
- #293
- 17 December 2010 - 11:33 PM
This post has been edited by Hoheh: 18 December 2010 - 03:07 AM
- #294
- 18 December 2010 - 03:04 AM
Come on guys.
Come on.
- #295
- 21 December 2010 - 03:28 AM
- #296
- 21 December 2010 - 05:39 AM
AbbeyXDaisy
SueXMcCain
DavidXRachel
MikeXLucy (I do hate Sandy)
Seriously. Sandy can die in a hole with her inability to pronounce hard C's. A firey hole filled with snakes and badgers.
- #297
- 02 January 2011 - 02:33 AM
and
All of these I would be happy with.
- #298
- 02 January 2011 - 02:41 AM
McCain X
That is all
This post has been edited by Doomworks: 02 January 2011 - 10:00 AM
- #299
- 02 January 2011 - 10:00 AM
Toffee, on 21 December 2010 - 03:28 AM, said:
Come on guys.
Come on.
Christ. I dub this "shishkabob-shipping."
- #300
- 02 January 2011 - 10:19 AM












