What don't you like about the poster above you?
- 08 April 2012 - 07:32 PM
- 09 April 2012 - 05:43 AM
You're not wrong.
A general reminder, there's a rule on the first post of this thread: If you don't have nothing to say about the person above you do not post.
Edit: Also you don't have to hit the person above you, you can always hit the next one up.
Captain Lechy said:
Any lol random ! !! answers like this are offtopic. Don't turn this thread into the shitty recess one; think before you post.
- 09 April 2012 - 08:16 AM
Chris, I find that often you can be quick to anger and can be kind of abrasive. It's not a bad thing all the time, though it can make being around you hard.
- 09 April 2012 - 08:29 PM
This post has been edited by The Swimmer: 10 April 2012 - 12:49 AM
- 10 April 2012 - 12:48 AM
@CaptainBaconMan: I can't think of any negative qualities about you, but I can't think of any positive qualities either. You seem to meld in the background, and I think you try to fight that.
@Smash Genesis: You can be incredibly full of yourself at times. That girl didn't want to date you because she thought you were cute, she dated you because she knew you would pay for it. Not everyone thinks the same way as you do, and I think you could be potentially autistic.
@Chris: I think you've improved quite a bit, but there isn't much else to you at all. Also apparently you're a shameless Republican.
@Jerk: I don't really see much substance in most of your posts. I think you are putting up a show by trying to shoehorn a joke into every post as you possible, and that dilutes the impact of humor to me. I think you are good when you are being sincere.
@RC!: Abstract art sux.
@whf: I think you kind of have a holier-than-thou attitude. You can be pretentious when you argue sometimes, and it shows when you complain about people being stubborn (durrr i know i can be that too but i learn from my mistakes) -- because, what if you're the one being stubborn? You dolt. You are also unsympathetic and piss terrible at giving advice to make people feel better, such as trying to guilt trip Susan into not feeling guilty.
@Lux Aeterna: You win a free pass.
@SuitCase: I get peeved when you say overprovocative things.
@Susan: Why give a shit that the rules are stricter and harsher? It gives more flexibility, and of course it can be risky, but have the moderators even done anything that would not be considered worth it? I think that's a slippery slope fallacy. It's funny that Lefty hasn't even been banned for speaking out so that makes your point even more questionable.
@Meowth: You live up to a lot of double standards. You say you can take critique, but then you get set off by a couple of them and try to pin that on an arbitrary reason (why give a shit if they're "mean"? How is that relevant to the critique? Those are never properly answered.) You whine about how people can be mean, but you're an ass yourself.
@Snoregore: More like Snorebore.
@Randommoron5: Go away.
@Leo-Inu: You too.
@Purin: Self-hating penis who is really really awkward when he tries to socialize.
@Codysseus: Hurrrrr negative sux kill yourself
@The Swimmer: zzzzz
@Volgrand: Terrible anti-abortion guy.
@regularpatron: Is a MikexLucy shipper, which is a sign for many bad things to come from him.
@LackLuster: You are very annoying about your opinions, because they are extremely whiny -- which I wouldn't mind if they weren't so shallow and shortsighted
This post has been edited by Seppucrow: 10 April 2012 - 07:07 PM
- 10 April 2012 - 06:57 PM
Second off, you're right, that girl didn't want to date me because she thought I was cute, she went out with me - once, I might add, "dated" implies an extended relationship - she went out with my because she likes the power she has over boys and likes hopping from guy to guy on power trips. I should have realized this when it happened, though I don't see how this makes me full of myself in the slightest. If you could explain that, please?
- 10 April 2012 - 07:46 PM
Also I have noticed you've been a hypocrite going back to the "I was joking/was not serious" factor. You have a habit of saying stupid unfunny jokes and then get all "but it was meant to be a joke, it doesn't matter if it turned out to be unfunny" but when someone else does it you're like "WELL THAT WASN'T VERY FUNNY"
also seppucrow your hate parade was kind of pathetically shortsighted soz
also here's the thing, "you totally give autie vibes" doesn't suddenly mean I am a qualified psychologist nor was that the intention of Seppucrow's response. Total evidence of your habit of taking things at face value. It's like people who get uppity when you say their opinion is stupid and they're like "are you saying I am mentally deficient??? Are you saying I am broken??" and it's like no it's a casual word to use to describe a dumb disagreement.
- 10 April 2012 - 10:27 PM
Decided to reword that to sound less retarded.
My problem is that you keep calling me passive-aggressive, instead of listening to the reasons for what I do. I think you're judging me unfairly.
Sometimes I get this vibe that you hate everything I say or do, not because you simply disagree with it, but because you have some personal vendetta against me.
This post has been edited by Meowth: 10 April 2012 - 11:18 PM
- 10 April 2012 - 10:44 PM
I.E. Smash is the focus of my post.
I'm not going to go so far as to say you have autism or something similar--I don't know you well enough to make such a judgment. But I will point this out--there's a big difference between "taking things at face value" and "taking things literally." Let me try to give a--somewhat weak, but passable--example:
Statement: "Ugh, I wanna kill myself."
Reading with subtext: "This person is obviously feeling insecurities or has some deeper dissatisfaction with their life."
Reading at face value: "This person is sad."
Reading literally: "ZOMG I GOTTA GET ALL THE KNIFES AND GUNS AWAY FROM THEM OR THEY'LL COMMIT SUICIDE!"
If you take everything as literally as you just did in response to Seppucrow's post then I wonder just how often jokes and sarcasm have gone over your head. You're clearly very astute in your observations for true meaning.
(That was sarcasm)
"[T]here's no subtext here. If you don't mean something, why say it to begin with?" Well, to play off your novel example, why put subtext in a novel? I'm sure you know the answer to this one: to make a point in a unique (or at least more original) way and/or to get across said point in a more effective manner. One might argue that Seppucrow got his point across that he thinks you're a bit slow on the uptake far more effectively because he used an example often associated with ineptitude in thinking (even if in reality, calling an autistic person "stupid" is inaccurately rendered in some respects).
In addition, your second paragraph indicates that you're prone to splitting hairs for no reason. Don't try to say "OH BUT YOU JUST SEPARATED LITERAL AND TAKING THINGS AT FACE VALUE YOU HYPOCRITE," because I did it for a reason. You, on the other hand, were like "oh, it's actually 'going out' not 'dating,' which kind of reminds me of a sample argument going like so:
"Your an idiot."
"It's 'you're,' dumbass."
"Oh gosh darn it all to heck I guess he wins!"
... This seemed so long and spiteful but really it's just long. ;__;
This post has been edited by Lux Aeterna: 10 April 2012 - 10:54 PM
- 10 April 2012 - 10:54 PM
No offense, Lux...
It's because you writed a big post, and as English isn't my native language, I tend to become bored with some posts
It's nothing personal
- 11 April 2012 - 12:08 AM
Very tentative guess there.
- 11 April 2012 - 01:06 AM
This post has been edited by Biblioholic: 11 April 2012 - 06:29 AM
- 11 April 2012 - 06:21 AM
This post has been edited by Itu: 11 April 2012 - 01:06 PM
- 11 April 2012 - 01:04 PM
- 11 April 2012 - 08:14 PM
As for you, even though I know you pretty well I don't really have much to say about you. That may be something to say in itself.
(Since I didn't say much about chris feel free to skip this and do him instead if you prefer)
This post has been edited by Itu: 11 April 2012 - 10:54 PM
- 11 April 2012 - 10:48 PM
Now what really prompted me to make this post: I was thinking back to this particular post I'd made in another thread half a year ago, and wanted to revisit a couple of the people I'd called out there.
Susan, I always disliked you because of your very blunt manner. It seemed like you were constantly angry most of the time, and radiating that anger towards pretty much anyone, not just those who pissed you off. That sort of behaviour tends to make people dislike you, and doesn't exactly win you many friends. However, lately I've seen you make a couple of lovely posts! You were being supportive of nate and Voluntas in the Dys4ia thread, and I was like, "Holy fuck, is this really Susan?" And you made some very thoughtful posts on transgender issues. This is a side of you I'd like to see you express more often, because being more positive and receptive really does make you much more likable as a person.
whf, you always used to annoy me because you'd make shitposts in threads you didn't care for. Some people thought your posts were funny, but to me they were annoying because you were actively disrupting other people's threads instead of merely ignoring them. So you might understand that I was somewhat skeptical when SuitCase made you a mod. I have to say though, that so far I've been pleasantly surprised. You've generally been to the point when tossing a thread into Detention, and you seem to be exercising reasonable judgment. And the one time I disagreed with one of your actions in private, you took my arguments into consideration. These are things that make a good mod, and I hope you continue this pattern, because I'd love to admit that I was wrong about you.
Some of you may ask why I would bring up Susan and whf again, only to say nice things about them in the end. The answer is, if I'm going to criticize people, then to be fair, I also need to acknowledge when they're doing something right, and give credit where credit is due.
Oh, am I supposed to say something about the person above me? I suppose I could agree that Itu can be overly sarcastic at times. Then again, I could probably say the same thing about Purin. As for Chris, he's my favourite teabagging furfag. Although maybe that just means I don't know him well enough.
- 12 April 2012 - 05:32 AM
Itu, I don't have any problem with sarcasm, but sometimes because of how often you do it I get confused as to whether you are being serious about a topic or not. Though that could just be me. I'm not really that good with detecting sarcasm in forum posts.
Okay, Jerk. While I have no problem with people cracking jokes, sometimes you go a little far. That's all I have to say there.
Seriously? Seppucrow, that's not even able to be considered vague. You either have something about me you dislike or you don't, and that post makes it obvious you do have something about me you dislike. Be more specific. Sorry if I come off as rude (not really my intention), but saying "go away" without any detail of what you dislike about me tells me next to nothing. I can take it, so don't be holding back. If I couldn't I wouldn't be posting here.
- 13 April 2012 - 09:05 PM
- 14 April 2012 - 05:06 AM
- 14 April 2012 - 05:10 AM
also tat mAce person sems like a relly nice guy
- 14 April 2012 - 05:54 AM
Glad it was someone as new as me, I don't feel right to judge anyone else. Idk who maceofhearts is...
This post has been edited by SmashFiles: 14 April 2012 - 07:58 AM
- 14 April 2012 - 06:42 AM
One mistake. I usually have no spelling errors. Besides, it was late at night.
This post has been edited by Codysseus: 14 April 2012 - 04:33 PM
- 14 April 2012 - 07:55 AM
Using "you're" in place of "your". You may now take some time to reflect on the irony of your statements.
- 14 April 2012 - 08:20 AM
Damned if I can remember a time when I even shared my opinions really.
- 14 April 2012 - 08:52 AM
- 14 April 2012 - 10:32 AM
EDIT: Oh, and to avoid confusion, this is my only account here.
This post has been edited by mAceOfHearts: 14 April 2012 - 11:48 AM
- 14 April 2012 - 11:15 AM
- 14 April 2012 - 10:13 PM
This post has been edited by Seppucrow: 15 April 2012 - 05:41 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 05:40 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 06:11 PM
And I should also add that "real mania" does not mean you are psychotic. It is simply a state of increased norepinephrine that results in some of the symptoms you were experiencing it. It is normally neurotic.
- 15 April 2012 - 06:27 PM
My constant struggle in life is worrying about what I say, because I'm afraid of being so care-free that I say something completely terrible and then suffer from the repercussions after my care-free mood is over, and that happens all the time. I'm aware of the possibility that I'm overreacting to things, but I can't help but remain unconvinced of that.
- 15 April 2012 - 06:42 PM
this is seriously the best thing in this thread
(also counts as my don't like for seppu)
This post has been edited by Kaxbe: 15 April 2012 - 06:44 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 06:43 PM
Oh that Purin never being so frontal and direct. *bats eyelashes*
- 15 April 2012 - 06:55 PM
Good because I hate yours and nearly everything you've said and done in these forums that I've witnessed.
- 15 April 2012 - 06:58 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 07:00 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 07:01 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 07:04 PM
For starters, it didn't even register that he mocked you. It seemed more to me he was just fucking with LackLuster. Regardless, there wasn't much behind it.
Second, why would I care if SuitCase mocked you? I fail to see how that affects this conversation. You know, my life does revolve things beside just arguing and thinking about SuitCase.
This post has been edited by Meowth: 15 April 2012 - 07:07 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 07:07 PM
Well, I think you have a very personal issue with SuitCase, and that you're more inclined to take cases against him for that.
- 15 April 2012 - 07:22 PM
- 15 April 2012 - 07:29 PM
Hahahaha. I never really thought whf came off that way, more that he was just annoying.
I do admit to having the tendency to be virtuous and holier-than-thou myself though. It's one of my faults that I still struggle with on occasion. It comes with the territory of having traditionally considered myself smarter than others. I had a lot of trouble with that in another forum in the past, and I had to face my faults there in much the same way Abbey is now facing his faults in the current chapter. I'm still friends with the people in that forum, or still in contact, though lots of times I think I'd have a better relationship with them, the way things used to be in the past, had I not been all virtuous and telling people what to do.
- 15 April 2012 - 09:08 PM