Bittersweet Candy Bowl Forums

bump because i was enjoying this thread and hope for dumb responses

whf, on 11 January 2012 - 04:11 AM, said:

What an enlightening and positive contribution to this conversation. Thank you.

An enlightening contribution to a thread about furries is an oxymoron.

Johnny, you should know by now that trying to use sarcasm against Snooths only strengthens his powers.

Johnny Hurricane, on 11 January 2012 - 07:24 PM, said:

i thought about it for a bit and i'm pretty sure this guy is being sarcastic. i'm 90% sure he means that i didn't contribute.
well, shit dude.
i guess you're right man.
i fucked up, im sorry.
that was wrong. i really shouldn't have just come in like that and halted all discussion on the topic. i've definitely made the topic a lot shittier as my post didn't contribute anything and there was no reason to post it, so i'm sorry bro.
i'd go back and edit it, but i fear the damage is done.
i mean, forgetting the fact that the topic would've been buried forever under other thought provoking threads about just how fantastic your day was today, "funny things about the person above you", and how outraged you are at something bad happening somewhere in the world AND the fact that i was bumping it to try and make an effort to revive the conversation, i had no reason to bump the thread and i didn't contribute to the conversation at all.
and yes i'm sure you were following the discussion very closely too, despite the fact that it was a page back and you weren't posting, i imagine you were refreshing every 15 minutes, waiting intently to the the progression on the debate regarding the media outlook of a group of internet fetishists, looking to respond but just not responding yourself. it breaks my heart to see what i have done.
and it's just not true that the only reason we're having any further discussion here is because of my bump, so i'd be fooling myself to say that. look, i just clearly had nothing to contribute despite the fact that my previous post not only contributed to the thread and was completely relevant, but shot the very concept of its existence so quickly out of my ass that it went into space, and has since remained unchallenged.
ok? i just made an irrelevant post that didn't contribute at all. i'm sorry. i'm only human, you know. i really try to contribute and say relevant things but i slip up every now and then, and it's bad, so again i apologize. i didn't mean for this to happen. thanks for understanding.

This post has been edited by whf: 12 January 2012 - 04:21 AM

Why can't we just go back to the good old days where furrys where the shit frozen in the shape of a sword. Everyone loved bugs the bunny or who'zit, when did things grow preversemuttermuttermutterYa hooligans with your fancy interwebs. All o this is yer fault. Let people talk to people honestly and suddenly everyone loses there sence of decency and starts running around ing 30 pounds of cotten with there balls hangen out in spite of it what the fuck

We'll think about accepting your appology snooths but forgivness it a long way comming dagnabit.

This post has been edited by Craft aids: 12 January 2012 - 05:30 AM

Craft aids, on 12 January 2012 - 05:29 AM, said:

It seems like you like talking shit about furries. But in the end, the vast majority of them are much more fucking literate than your mentally handicapped ass.

whf, on 12 January 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:

TL;DR, no boobies.

That's the most hairy fucking dolphin I've ever seen.

This post has been edited by StrawHat: 12 January 2012 - 09:43 AM

oh sweet Jesus why?

I picture groups of children simultaneously weeping at the sight of that. I doub I'm that far off either.

StrawHat, on 12 January 2012 - 09:07 AM, said:

hahah i cant believe you took that post seriously

also marshmallow makes best post
i forgot what site that came off of but its some humanoid dolphin sex comic thing and its amazing

StrawHat, on 12 January 2012 - 09:07 AM, said:

I believe it's a skill they acquired jerking one handed to bugs bunny over the last ten years.

Natural selection gone bad.

This post has been edited by LackLuster: 12 January 2012 - 02:51 PM

whf, on 12 January 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:

If you're going to revive and/or bump a thread, at least have something interesting to say. I understand that by bumping, you were bringing this thread back into people's awareness. However, this is kind of unnecessary. If someone had something new or interesting to say on this thread, they would post it without a reminder. The reason I didn't post for a while was because I had nothing to say, and didn't want to bump this thread without actually contributing.
Additionally, it doesn't help your case that you bumped the thread because you were "enjoying this thread and hope for dumb responses.
(I will say though: Let's give credit where credit is due, that was some excellent counter-sarcasm. Well played.)

whf, on 12 January 2012 - 02:34 PM, said:

Silly snooths, someone will ALWAYS take it seriously.
That’s why you are supposed to have a grain of truth in all this sort of stuff. I do actualy believe that the rise of furies happened because odd fellows were allowed to be honest to each other but I have no issue with it. The fursuits are awful though. Barny isn't my idea of a turn on. That would be more of a novelty.

This post has been edited by Craft aids: 12 January 2012 - 06:08 PM

Johnny Hurricane, on 12 January 2012 - 04:56 PM, said:

my goal while bumping it was to recieve a retort (i.e. what i had classified as "dumb responses") because i thought my posts had kind of gone unanswered by those i had called out/ had some potential for further discussion (why i said "i am enjoying this thread"). i thought that maybe the topic had been passed up and gone unseen by someone who could contribute either of those things, and decided that it was worth bumping once. i didnt need to contribute to the discussion, as 1. i had seemingly ended the discussion with my last post meaning that theres no discussion to contribute to CHRIST 2. if i had bumped it while contributing something else to the topic when i had literally just posted everything i needed to say, it would have been redundant.

ps.

Craft aids, on 12 January 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:

oh right i forgot you genuinely couldn't spell/ structure sentences coherently
i guess that sort of is true though. the only reason most people are comfortable sharing such a fetish is due to the internet giving people anonymity/ connecting people who have similar interests, undeniably.

There is one mispelled word. Just one. Del wit hit

This post has been edited by Craft aids: 12 January 2012 - 07:43 PM

More than one, actually.

Two!

Three, if you count his misspelling of 'Barney'.

The only words that spell check underlined where names and the word "actualy".
A fur suit is not the same as a fursuit. Snooths is not a word and Barny isn't a word.

edit:
k, I guess barny was mispelled anyway

This post has been edited by Craft aids: 12 January 2012 - 07:43 PM

Fury =/= Furry, so Furies and Furries are different.

just teasing you.

WHY DID YOU FUCKING STOP?

FAGGOT

....Ignoring the furry part, isn't that a public bondage threesome? Off to jail with you

Not technically.

Ok, why not?
I guess that you could argue that humping isn't equal to sex and that you never actualy see penetration.

Is there a law against humping a person in the street?

whf, on 12 January 2012 - 02:34 PM, said:

Nope.

Craft aids, on 13 January 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:

Yes.

StrawHat, on 13 January 2012 - 03:32 PM, said:

well you responded seriously sooooo
also im pretty confident thats remi gaillard in that gif and he is a french national treasure so shut up he can do what he wants

whf, on 13 January 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:

Where'd you get that idea?

StrawHat, on 13 January 2012 - 04:51 PM, said:

Because every word you said was fact.
Devoid of the vaugest trases off irony or satire.
Simply one opinion you validly hold after another.
You know, serious.

UMMMMMM.....

This post has been edited by the 1D: 13 January 2012 - 06:20 PM

You're an idiot.

SUSAN I'M 12

That's not an excuse, that's you caught being dumb and hiding behind your age.

sorry

This post has been edited by the 1D: 13 January 2012 - 07:55 PM

Everything I needed to know about handling crybabies I learned in Random Chat.

i have learned my lesson

This post has been edited by the 1D: 13 January 2012 - 07:53 PM

As soon as you knock it off with the obnoxious pictures of cats, sure.

okay

Craft aids, on 13 January 2012 - 06:05 PM, said:

Can't take it seriously if I don't know what the fuck you said in your original post, silly.

thats some terrible logic

Honestly, I can state for a fact that he puts a lot more into actively thinking things out than a lot of people in here. The problem is the result is either incomprehensible or over-analytical.

Jerk, on 15 January 2012 - 03:24 AM, said:

Either/or?
It's usually both.

One thing I keep coming across is people mixing mascots with furries. Mascots are not furries. They're being paid to sweat in a stuffy costume and dance around. Unless we're talking about high school and college, in which case they are not paid at all.

Every responce this week from this point on will consist of no more then 20 words in one senence starting now;

I think that snooths was talking to Strawhat