Forum Rules (now Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger)
- #51
- 25 March 2012 - 06:46 PM
- #52
- 25 March 2012 - 06:55 PM
The new rules will take getting used to yes. If you're not an idiot then they shouldn't effect you though. IF you have trouble with a mod for whatever reason, remember that you can discuss it with them or others in PM's. I still will be open to help anyone who needs it be it with a mod, general member, thread or whatever. You may always contact me privately about the issue. My skype is listed in my profile and I am always on the IRC if you cannot reach me here for whatever reason. This may seem like strict enforcement, but in reality the only ones who should worry are the trouble makers.
So just sit back and relax. As long as you make good posts you shouldn't have to worry.
- #53
- 25 March 2012 - 07:25 PM
- #54
- 25 March 2012 - 07:27 PM
- #55
- 25 March 2012 - 07:33 PM
- #56
- 25 March 2012 - 07:38 PM
Susan, on 25 March 2012 - 05:24 PM, said:
No, really, I'm not going to do anything like that. I'm just going to do my job, and that is to uphold the rules. So all of you worrying about power trips or bias or anything - think again.
Well, we -say- we aren't Nazis, but you know, no one really knows what happened to the special ed folk. We MIGHT have thrown them in ovens. Maybe.
Not saying we did, of course. Just saying that, you know, coal is getting expensive and we've gotta keep warm during the freak snowstorms, yeah?
More seriously I don't see any problems with this. These forums aren't really meant for feedback anyway, they're more of a service for the community. They aren't like, say, the Steam Forums or something, they have a different sort of purpose and it makes sense to clamp down on them so that the creators (who made this place for fun) can, you know, have fun here.
Just remember, if we tell you to get on the train, it is taking you to the rest of the internet, not to extermination camps. Really.
- #57
- 25 March 2012 - 08:09 PM
- #58
- 25 March 2012 - 08:45 PM
- #59
- 25 March 2012 - 08:48 PM
I guess that the future Honor Roll threads will now be of a much higher quality than they once were, but will come up less often than they once had before.
- #60
- 25 March 2012 - 08:53 PM
- #61
- 25 March 2012 - 10:12 PM
At first, I was annoyed that Recess was suddenly missing from the forums, but then I thought about it and it really was just a big time sink with nothing all that interesting going on. Sure, I'll miss some of the discussions, but with these new rules about topics and whatnot there will probably be even more reason to come here than just to kill time
- #62
- 25 March 2012 - 10:25 PM
whf, on 25 March 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:
Good job summing it up. I do not even think I can counter argue without sounding stupid or childish or both. I am truly moved by your post.
Edited: Sorry I had a small typo.
This post has been edited by Buddy1006: 25 March 2012 - 10:32 PM
- #63
- 25 March 2012 - 10:28 PM
This post has been edited by Dr. Klaus: 25 March 2012 - 10:29 PM
- #64
- 25 March 2012 - 10:29 PM
Dr. Klaus, on 25 March 2012 - 10:29 PM, said:
I mean who wants us to spend a lot of time here right?
- #65
- 25 March 2012 - 10:36 PM
Nik, on 25 March 2012 - 10:36 PM, said:
stop your shit. klaus may have poorly worded his post as wasting time is all any forum is anyway, but recess was a place for wasting time in the worst possible way.
- #66
- 25 March 2012 - 10:40 PM
whf, on 25 March 2012 - 10:40 PM, said:
Yeah, I'll admit I could have worded that better.
- #67
- 25 March 2012 - 10:45 PM
So long and thanks for all the fish.
- #68
- 25 March 2012 - 11:52 PM
Rawrdinosaur, on 25 March 2012 - 11:52 PM, said:
So long and thanks for all the fish.
You are unworthy to quote Douglas Adams! To the showers with you!
This post has been edited by Titanium Dragon: 26 March 2012 - 12:02 AM
- #69
- 25 March 2012 - 11:58 PM
- #70
- 26 March 2012 - 12:05 AM

This would be offensive, but jokes make it ok.
- #71
- 26 March 2012 - 12:05 AM
- #72
- 26 March 2012 - 12:09 AM
So the things a mod should do in certain situations, is it in written form so the mod'll just have to follow procedure? 'cause if not then a lot of it is up to interpretation. Or the mods can just talk about it amongst themselves I guess when they get there, but then that means they can make more rules up at whim.
- #73
- 26 March 2012 - 12:45 AM
My main concern is how far one can push "jokes" until it warrants a warning/ban.
EDIT: @Mouse: I have no idea if mods have the typical TempBan/PermBan abilities like in all typical forums (I will assume so) but one must have faith that they will handle it with as little conflict as possible.
This post has been edited by Ved_of_Flames: 26 March 2012 - 12:51 AM
- #74
- 26 March 2012 - 12:47 AM
MouseCat, on 26 March 2012 - 12:45 AM, said:
So the things a mod should do in certain situations, is it in written form so the mod'll just have to follow procedure? 'cause if not then a lot of it is up to interpretation. Or the mods can just talk about it amongst themselves I guess when they get there, but then that means they can make more rules up at whim.
That's not it at all. You can argue with and about mods, just not publicly because it takes up space for otherwise intelligent discussion with drama. Just ask them why they did whatever they did. As long as you don't end up shitposting and causing retarded drama in the forums, you'll be fine. There's nothing to be afraid of as long as you contribute to the topic.
- #75
- 26 March 2012 - 12:49 AM
This post has been edited by Supah: 26 March 2012 - 01:09 AM
- #76
- 26 March 2012 - 01:06 AM
Ved_of_Flames, on 26 March 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
My main concern is how far one can push "jokes" until it warrants a warning/ban.
EDIT: @Mouse: I have no idea if mods have the typical TempBan/PermBan abilities like in all typical forums (I will assume so) but one must have faith that they will handle it with as little conflict as possible.
banned
- #77
- 26 March 2012 - 01:09 AM
I honestly really find it sad that it got to this point, but what comes, comes.
- #78
- 26 March 2012 - 01:10 AM
ignore that i have autism doopdeedong sometimes i eat playdough so my poop looks weird
This post has been edited by whf: 26 March 2012 - 01:26 AM
- #79
- 26 March 2012 - 01:21 AM
- #80
- 26 March 2012 - 01:27 AM
- #81
- 26 March 2012 - 02:08 AM
- #82
- 26 March 2012 - 02:10 AM
Taeshi, on 26 March 2012 - 02:08 AM, said:
Finally, Jesus Christ we can agree on this.
- #83
- 26 March 2012 - 02:15 AM
Sparkfur, on 26 March 2012 - 01:10 AM, said:
Aw man these words are the keywords in my theme song though.
Jokes aside the new rules will at least have the forum act a little less anarchic than it did before.
- #84
- 26 March 2012 - 02:31 AM
Now if only we could get spacemouse posting......
- #85
- 26 March 2012 - 02:48 AM
Also my favorite Thread was saved. :3
This post has been edited by Zevida: 26 March 2012 - 02:55 AM
- #86
- 26 March 2012 - 02:55 AM
Taeshi, on 26 March 2012 - 02:48 AM, said:
Now if only we could get spacemouse posting......
- #87
- 26 March 2012 - 03:04 AM
- #88
- 26 March 2012 - 03:05 AM
- #89
- 26 March 2012 - 03:07 AM
What can we do.......
Don't leave us.......
- #90
- 26 March 2012 - 03:12 AM
- #91
- 26 March 2012 - 03:14 AM
Taeshi, on 26 March 2012 - 03:12 AM, said:
What can we do.......
Don't leave us.......
i will only post in threads about PauloxLucy
it is my code...
- #92
- 26 March 2012 - 03:14 AM
- #93
- 26 March 2012 - 03:15 AM
Jerk, on 26 March 2012 - 03:15 AM, said:
You mean we actually have to use the forums?
A frightening thought.
- #94
- 26 March 2012 - 03:16 AM
Zevida, on 26 March 2012 - 02:55 AM, said:
Also my favorite Thread was saved. :3
You should've seen Suit's first draft if you wanted really scarey. But yeah, I like this revision, the old rules are still there, but it's just a heavier emphasis on active moderation. If you look at it like that, I don't think 75% of the people here are going to have too many problems adjusting.
I had that problem with Social studies at it definitely looked more like the debate thread. With recess gone there's really not much room for confusion.
@Spacemouse posting - Lets see how long this goes for
- #95
- 26 March 2012 - 03:17 AM
also yeah this is better good job all around A+ to everyone
- #96
- 26 March 2012 - 03:17 AM
- #97
- 26 March 2012 - 03:47 AM
May I ask for a clarification on rule 4? In an (intelligent) debate topic, is it permitted to (politely) disagree with a moderator on the subject of the topic when they are acting as participants in the debate rather than moderators moderating the debate?
- #98
- 26 March 2012 - 06:00 AM
- #99
- 26 March 2012 - 06:13 AM
Quaddy, on 26 March 2012 - 06:00 AM, said:
May I ask for a clarification on rule 4? In an (intelligent) debate topic, is it permitted to (politely) disagree with a moderator on the subject of the topic when they are acting as participants in the debate rather than moderators moderating the debate?
No.
What part of "sycophantically worship" do you not understand?
- #100
- 26 March 2012 - 06:13 AM




























