"Furries" directed by Michael Bay Hey, I believe someone wanted this to be it's own topic. Opinions
We got into the topic at "The Phancharacter Menace" and I decided that I will let you all express what you think about furries. Go ahead, I don't mind the slander, hell it's all you people have given me since i started posting.
I wil come and read your opinions, nod my head a few times, then write something back to you after the thirty seconds of ill thought out typing, then I'll go away from the computer for hours enjoying life, while you guys spend the same amount of time planning out your writing, then call me a waste of time. Oh how I love Internet logic.... I'm sorry what? I got a little bored and started talking in stories like usual. BEGIN TYPING!
- #1
- 17 December 2010 - 10:45 AM
Everyone says different things and I'm too bored to go out and look for it myself.
The truth is out there.
Does it come with the sexual interpretation as well?
- #2
- 17 December 2010 - 11:49 AM
- #3
- 17 December 2010 - 12:13 PM
This does not necessarily include the lascivious connotations that the word has received. If somebody or something also can be read with the... lewd interpretation, then that is by definition a yiff as well as furry.
- #4
- 17 December 2010 - 12:25 PM
The idea of a fandom surrounding this concept was coined in 1890 by Palmer Cox who, at the time, referred to the appreciation of what he called "Funny Animals" in reference to animations starring animals (such as Fox & Crow or Carl Barks' Scrooge McDuck).
It evolved over time, and nowadays the Furry Fandom is a rather large and hard to label group, primarily because of the fact that they have refused to narrow down just what a furry is beyond the description (Coined by Fred Patten) "the organized appreciation and dissemination of art and prose regarding 'Furries', or fictional mammalian anthropomorphic characters."
As such, if you were to ask "What is a furry", and I were to answer any of the following...
"Somebody who likes Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who draws Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who dresses up like Anthropomorphic animals"
"Somebody who believes they have some inner kinship with their 'Fursona' animal"
"Somebody who gets sexually aroused by Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who has sex while dressed as an Anthropomorphic animal"
I'd be right. The trouble is that any one given person who identifies as a furry does not necessarily fit into ALL of those categories. As such, it makes it hard to disseminate just what somebody MEANS when they say "I am a furry".
It's all very fascinating to dig into really, but frustrating to deal with in a social setting.
- #5
- 17 December 2010 - 01:47 PM
Quote
Oh? Most definitions I have read disagree with that. That said, I really think the term ought to apply only to animals, but from what I have heard a walking and talking couch would also be "furry".
- #6
- 17 December 2010 - 02:05 PM
Yeah, I am a furry, I guess.
Lion king is friggin awesome, so is Sonic and Star Fox and such.
I like the concept of anthropomorphic characters.
btw, this image:

You can probably understand it without me translating it, (and maybe there's a version in English of this...)
But it says:
10% -> Not furry
50% -> Furry
70% -> VERY Furry
100% -> Cat
Just funny.
I'm ok with any of them, actually.
This post has been edited by Lycan: 17 December 2010 - 07:31 PM
- #7
- 17 December 2010 - 04:01 PM
- #8
- 17 December 2010 - 04:06 PM
- #9
- 17 December 2010 - 04:33 PM
- #10
- 17 December 2010 - 04:36 PM
Maverik, on 17 December 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:
Adding to information, the end result of this is that they believe they can see themselves in the species, this is whats called the "fursona" if you don't understand, well I'd probably imagine it to be alot like... ummm... like... *snaps fingers* like the Pokemon Mystery Dungeon personallity test thing! However, unlike Mystery Dungeons' personallity test thing, the one you get is the one you wanted. (see thats funny because the game keeps getting my results wrong and makes me Psyduck, lol... the fuck.)
Actually, it's not just Anthromorphic animals, sometimes they can be regular animals. Adding to information, there are quote, "furries" unquote, that use dragons, lizards, and other species without fur as their fursona. There is also furries who use Pokemon and Digimon as their Fursona. I have no clue why, but the sonic fanbase some how passed our defenses and started using their sonic fancharacters as their fursonas... this is why no one likes sonic anymore.
Maverik, on 17 December 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:
Well I definitley don't consider BittersweetCandyBowl a furry comic (even if they advertise on Furaffinity)
Ballerina Mafia: The Mummy's Curse
This is a comic series MADE by a furry, and while it does often use anthromorphic characters, there is no real plot to it, its a "single page jokes, skits, sketches, and that kind of stuff."
Maverik, on 17 December 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:
There is a reason one of the most popular furry websites is called, "fur AFFINITY", but the other problem of labeling the furry community is that now the furry community is so diverse, wide spread, with so many (nowadays) different aspects.
Maverik, on 17 December 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:
As such, if you were to ask "What is a furry", and I were to answer any of the following...
"Somebody who likes Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who draws Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who dresses up like Anthropomorphic animals"
"Somebody who believes they have some inner kinship with their 'Fursona' animal"
"Somebody who gets sexually aroused by Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who has sex while dressed as an Anthropomorphic animal"
I'd be right. The trouble is that any one given person who identifies as a furry does not necessarily fit into ALL of those categories. As such, it makes it hard to disseminate just what somebody MEANS when they say "I am a furry".
I'm glad that you properly understand where I'm coming from because, as Junior Boomer wrote, "Hi I'm generic furry A...". That got me upset. Most furries are very different from each other. In addition, the fact that the general public sees all of us furries to be exactly like the furries from CSI. Let's just say that even though I ended up randomly spouting that I was a furry to make a hater STFU. No one else knows, not my family, not my friends, not my GF (but my ex does know because she got me into it).
-Currently searching for link to add to this part of the response-
Maverik, on 17 December 2010 - 01:47 PM, said:
The topic was tagged as, "NSFW" so the disscussion can be as dirty as we want it. Your not talking about the forums when you say "Social Setting" in which case, yes, it is.
- #11
- 17 December 2010 - 05:05 PM
Junior Boomer, on 17 December 2010 - 04:36 PM, said:
See I'm going to start off by saying I'm sad that you don't like me, because your picture is a Dead Rising reference, and I love the Dead Rising series.
I'm also sad because when I looked at the comments this morning I was like, "Oh hey, they aren't attacking me, they aren't attacking each other, they aren't even attacking furries. They're having a serious disscussion about furries, writing out what they know and how they feel about it in a calm, unhurtful way. I can then explain the errors in their knowledge, and we could seriously be going somewhere with this thread." and I was happy n' stuff, but you just show up, hurt my feelings and now I've forgotten what it felt to be happy again.
aside from that. Your still doing that thing... stop it. What? you don't know what I mean? That thing! ya' know, the thing where because I'm an asshole, instead of just hating me, your basically saying the furry community is my clone army. I am a nice person at times, but because my life has become depraved of hope for human kindness (cities near the borders became very depressing places with robberies, deaths, corruption, there is never any news articles about anything good in the world happening.) I've become very serious about things.
I don't know anymore, I'm just tired. I'm not feeling sleepy, I just woke up a few hours ago, but I've been hoping for something to change, waiting. I don't even believing in God a few months ago, because saying he exists just makes it hurt more. I'm tired, I'm just... tired. I actually feel like crying, I swear to god I musn't cry, crying is a sign of weakness.
Boomer, if your going to hate me for what I've said the last two days, hate ME. Please, hate JUST me. Give the furry community a chance, because there a hell of a lot nicer than me.
- #12
- 17 December 2010 - 07:05 PM
SuitCase, on 17 December 2010 - 04:33 PM, said:
I've told NO ONE this because its still a secret, I can't trust anyone with secrets epecially how juicy this one is.(my friends have dirt on their other friends in order to force them to do stuff, but they don't have any dirt on me,) And I probably would have kept this a secret from this place too had I not been in a horrible mood, hoping to make myself feel better by going to BCB chat. To which after a guy repeatedly bashed the furry community, to the point where I confronted him hoping to get him to STFU. "Welp, since just about everyone who goes to this website is here in chat, guess its not a secret anymore... SHIT!"
- #13
- 17 December 2010 - 07:15 PM
On the topic on hand I have to say this: Whatever floats your boat. Just stay the hell away from mine.
- #14
- 17 December 2010 - 07:23 PM
Mr SuitCase, do you have a absolute opinion about everything?
If (from what I gather) the base of being furry is only liking anthropomorphic characters,
what is the problem in it?
Ergh, if we get your post and change 'furry' to 'gay' that's discrimination, bro.
I'm only stating this if the base of being furry does not involve bestiality.
Being gay is totally ok, because it's a relationship involving 2 adult (or at least rational) people that want that.
Bestiality is almost like Pedophilia in my eyes.
But saying people should be ashamed without giving any sort of support is plainly irresponsible
This post has been edited by Lycan: 17 December 2010 - 11:08 PM
- #15
- 17 December 2010 - 07:47 PM
Mister Nikel, on 17 December 2010 - 07:23 PM, said:
On the topic on hand I have to say this: Whatever floats your boat. Just stay the hell away from mine.
I have to do something retarded at these forums once a day now, if I don't the infection will spread throughout my body, killing me.
I want to know what people really thought of furries, like, normal opinions.
...
I was just thinking about it, I don't see anything wrong with being called a furry, because it's just another word to me now, natural, it's nothing new, it's something I've grown accustomed to. 'furry' the term I see most days now. Then I imagined how weird the term furry would sound to someone who never sees the term, and rejects its existance: in this mindset, the word itself would be foreign, and talking to someone who is labeled furry, well... that person would be seen as abnormal.
Then again, I DON'T KNOW IF THATS TRUE BECAUSE I'M NOT YOU GUYS.
But I guess my assumption as lead me to understand where you guys are coming from.
- #16
- 17 December 2010 - 08:06 PM
And hey I may be wrong because you didn't respond to my statement with a rage reply, which was surprisingly pleasant. Maybe I was being a little bit of a dick myself. My point is just try not to overreact to things
- #17
- 17 December 2010 - 08:12 PM
SuitCase, on 17 December 2010 - 04:33 PM, said:
^
or at least have a fucking sense of humor about it
- #18
- 17 December 2010 - 08:24 PM
Lycan, on 17 December 2010 - 07:47 PM, said:
Mr SuitCase, do you have a absolute opinion about everything?
If (from what I gather) the base of being furry is only liking anthropomorphic characters,
what is the problem it?
Ergh, if we get your post and change 'furry' to 'gay' that's discrimination, bro.
I'm only stating this if the base of being furry does not involve bestiality.
Being gay is totally ok, because it's a relationship involving 2 adult (or at least rational) people that want that.
Bestiality is almost like Pedophilia in my eyes.
But saying people should be ashamed without giving any sort of support is plainly irresponsible
By the way you structured your sentences its hard to tell weither I should correct you, or get mad at you. Because you either "Don't know if being a furry is the same thing as being into beastiallity" or "Believe that their is no difference because being a furry is the same thing as being into bestiallity."
I'm just going to say something that will not need to be revised depending on what you meant.
Beastiality is a human having sex with an animal, for the most part, its all shameless.
Furries are people who live a normal life but at the same time, have the belief that they are similar to a creature of their liking...
- #19
- 17 December 2010 - 08:50 PM
- #20
- 17 December 2010 - 09:03 PM
Best. Bandname. ever.
- #21
- 17 December 2010 - 09:08 PM
ILB, on 17 December 2010 - 12:25 PM, said:
This does not necessarily include the lascivious connotations that the word has received. If somebody or something also can be read with the... lewd interpretation, then that is by definition a yiff as well as furry.
...Quite frankly I don't think furries are attracted to toasters and houses. Trees, however...well, dryads and whatnot.
Also, in truth not many furries actually dress up. They mostly just prefer to draw/view things based around anthropomorphic characters.
And technically, the true definition of "yiff" is a general expression of excitement or happiness, often saying hello...which, I suppose, isn't too far from the "modern" defintion.
[/illthoughtoutpost]
- #22
- 17 December 2010 - 10:07 PM
Quote
Not attracted to the objects, but to their anthropomorphised versions. And 'attraction' is a bad word, it implies lust or obsession. It might just be that you think a situation is funnier when two ironing boards or mice are acting it out than what it would be when two humans were.
I also did not mean to say that furries necessarily dress up - if that impression came across, I apologise. I just meant to say that some of them spend parts (or lots) of their time on dress-up conventions.
When it comes to "yiff" - I did not know that. Still, it seems to be the tag many a furry resort to when they defend themselves against insults.
- #23
- 17 December 2010 - 10:17 PM
I have had many answers, from this forum and from many other sources I have looked.
but many I had from this forum was that "being furry is liking anthropomorphic characters" (<- simplifying everything)
I can see absolutely no shame in "liking anthropomorphic characters"
Then, Mr. SuitCase comes and say everyone that are furry should be ashamed of themselves.
Therefore, I had to assume he meant there was something to be ashamed of. From other sources, I could see people saying furry people also had animal related fetishes. That was the only thing I can think Mr. SuitCase could be referring to.
Then I said: if the base to be a furry does not have anything to do with bestiality, what's there to be ashamed of?
Was I clear this time?
I do think things may be funnier/better/more interesting with anthropomorphic characters (not necessarily animals) than with human characters. What fun would be Star Fox with a lame human model? The charm in it is the awesome Falcon Falco, the annoying Frog Slippy and so on.
I don't take that to the limits, though. I wouldn't like "The Big Bang Theory" having talking animals as characters. That would be lame, I think.
But can I still respect those that would like BBT with animals, as well.
Now, for what you said:
Quote
I think you meant shameful, instead of shameless?
And
Quote
I know I'm going to repeat myself, but I want to answer directly to this sentence:
No, as you can see in this post, I didn't mean either of what you said.
There is a big big difference between "Don't know if being a furry is the same as being into bestiality" and what I said:
"IF it's the same thing, then it is something to be ashamed of"
Please don't narrow what I said in a wrong way.
- #24
- 17 December 2010 - 11:06 PM
Some of my friends are gay or furry not furrry black ginger what ever. I realy don't give a shit ether way if you're a cool person and I like spending time with you. I mean I do live in SoCal. I'm shur some places or the people in your life can make it harder to just say fuck it and be your true self come what may but if that person or place cant acept you the way you are should you consider mabe removeing it from your life.
Ok now that my rant is over lets see how much flak I catch. Just cuz I can't seem to post on this forum without a few shots comeing my way.
This post has been edited by Hentai13: 18 December 2010 - 12:01 AM
- #25
- 17 December 2010 - 11:24 PM
Lycan, on 17 December 2010 - 11:06 PM, said:
kekon said:
I think you meant shameful, instead of shameless?
See, in my head I say one thing, but when I type it out, it comes out with one wording error it becomes incorrect.
Okay, let me try this again.
"Beastiallity, is done shamelessly. The people really don't see any problem with it, they do it shamelessley." There hopefully now I said it properly, my horrid headache from yesterday is comming back so I seriously hope I worded it properly.
- #26
- 17 December 2010 - 11:56 PM
SuitCase, on 17 December 2010 - 04:33 PM, said:
Agreed.
- #27
- 18 December 2010 - 01:25 AM
- #28
- 18 December 2010 - 01:54 AM
kekon, on 17 December 2010 - 08:50 PM, said:
The problem with this is that yet again, it's a blanket statement that doesn't actually apply to everyone in the community.
I've met several people who identify as furries who consider those people to be the extreamists of the group. Right up there with the fur suiters etc.
As usual, it comes down to a problem of definition. I've tried this... Ask a bunch of different furries to define 'furries', and you'll get almost as many definitions as people you ask.
- #29
- 18 December 2010 - 02:02 AM
We are talking about the community that invented the words "yiff" and "fursecution."
The prosecution rests, furfags.
- #30
- 18 December 2010 - 02:23 AM
Maverik, on 18 December 2010 - 02:02 AM, said:
kekon, on 17 December 2010 - 08:50 PM, said:
The problem with this is that yet again, it's a blanket statement that doesn't actually apply to everyone in the community.
I've met several people who identify as furries who consider those people to be the extreamists of the group. Right up there with the fur suiters etc.
As usual, it comes down to a problem of definition. I've tried this... Ask a bunch of different furries to define 'furries', and you'll get almost as many definitions as people you ask.
Then my question is, how similar were these definitions, did you ever hear a definition repeated (and I don't mean word by word thats stupid), how contrasting did two definitions get.
Jerk, on 18 December 2010 - 02:23 AM, said:
We are talking about the community that invented the words "yiff" and "fursecution."
The prosecution rests, furfags.
Overruled.
.gif)
Maybe next time you'll think twice before letting me be the judge.
- #31
- 18 December 2010 - 02:34 AM
So Kekon, you are hilariously ignorant. GOOD JOB SUCKING IT UP.
The actual definition is, indeed, being a fan of anthropomorphic characters. Almost every furry will agree on this being the definition. Otherkin are NOT furries in general, but a rather specific subset of them (and indeed, not all otherkin are furries, either - see also the elf otherkin).
- #32
- 18 December 2010 - 02:37 AM
- #33
- 18 December 2010 - 02:54 AM
You need only look at my first post to get an idea of the range of answers I got. I am nothing if not well researched on topics I make statements about.
- #34
- 18 December 2010 - 03:15 AM
- #35
- 18 December 2010 - 03:18 AM
Starwatcher, on 18 December 2010 - 03:18 AM, said:
We already decided to say that BCB is not a furry comic.
- #36
- 18 December 2010 - 03:26 AM
- #37
- 18 December 2010 - 03:34 AM
Bah, I don't care anyways, people can do whatever they want if they won't bother other's lives.
And the ones saying they should be ashamed need to mind their own business.
- #38
- 18 December 2010 - 03:35 AM
- #39
- 18 December 2010 - 03:35 AM
- #40
- 18 December 2010 - 03:38 AM
I agree. It sucks that people can be lumped in with a crowd you don't associate with due to having similar interests. I'm often called a furry because I don't discrimenate on whether or not something is Anthro if I like the story
- #41
- 18 December 2010 - 03:58 AM
Titanium Dragon, on 18 December 2010 - 02:37 AM, said:
So Kekon, you are hilariously ignorant. GOOD JOB SUCKING IT UP.
The actual definition is, indeed, being a fan of anthropomorphic characters. Almost every furry will agree on this being the definition. Otherkin are NOT furries in general, but a rather specific subset of them (and indeed, not all otherkin are furries, either - see also the elf otherkin).
Sorry it took so long to write back, a cold front just came in and its FREEZING COLD HERE NOW! I'm fine now, all i had to do was set the stove to 'high' and put my face on the stove, thats how you keep warm.
Real response here:
Well I didn't know that, I mean its only natural to not know everything about something, and some people do way too weird shit, I don't want to know, I never exactly looked into it, but if its really this important, then I'll change that post right now.
- #42
- 18 December 2010 - 03:58 AM
A person who has a particular fascination with anthropomorphic characters, i.e. they seek out stories about anthropomorphic characters because they are about anthropomorphic characters, spend time thinking about the physiology of such characters, etc.
If an anthropomorphic character appeals to you, or you create your own, you're like most other people and not necessarily a furry. You are becoming furry when you begin to recognise yourself as having an interest in "the furry fandom", and identifying as "furry", and consciously or unconsciously finding yourself consuming a majority of anthropomorphic art in fields where anthropomorphism is not the norm.
Because it's weird and quirky and shows a kind of superficial attachment to things on the basis of whether they're drawn with tails, it's worth being ashamed of.
- #43
- 18 December 2010 - 04:45 AM
Difference is the spice of life, I actually think there could be a lot weirder things to be into.
Just my 2 cents.
- #44
- 18 December 2010 - 05:02 AM
- #45
- 18 December 2010 - 06:29 AM
"Oh my god but I saw furries drawing sex stuff and ew its disgusting and anthro is just annoying"
The internet is nothing more than a visual device, if your /that/ agitated over an image than I think you have a weak mind. It's just an image, and it's simple to just not care about what your looking at. So you saw a cartoon the you disliked big deal. It's not a direct insult at you and is there really anything you can do about it? No, so, it's a bit of a waste of time if you ask me.
I'm talking about furry complainers here, trolls are different, trolls exploit the stupidity of most furries for their (and others) amusement. and it is amusing.
and I'm not completely backing up furries here. This may sound like a contradiction to what I typed in the earlier paragraph but...really...they have to cut back on the weird sex shit. I don't find it revolting or anything, it just gets so old after a while of trying to find a non-sexual picture. and it really doesn't help with their image, I know many furries who hate it when people think a "furry" is someone who likes animal sex but what else can you expect when you search for something and get a completley retarded looking thing that has to do with sex on most of the artwork, honestly it's almost as if "furry" really /is/ a sexual sub-culture.
Complainers need to chill
Furries need to take it down a notch
- #46
- 18 December 2010 - 06:42 AM
whf, on 18 December 2010 - 06:29 AM, said:
- #47
- 18 December 2010 - 06:47 AM
- #48
- 18 December 2010 - 06:55 AM
"Somebody who draws Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who dresses up like Anthropomorphic animals"
So basically this means ancient Egyptians are ‘furries’.
This just had to be done.
- #49
- 18 December 2010 - 08:50 AM
lolwut, on 17 December 2010 - 12:13 PM, said:
maybe when they transform for the first time, it will take about 5 minutes, and from then on it only takes 3 seconds.
Super pow, on 18 December 2010 - 08:50 AM, said:
"Somebody who draws Anthropomorphic art"
"Somebody who dresses up like Anthropomorphic animals"
So basically this means ancient Egyptians are ‘furries’.
This just had to be done.
DEM GOD DAMN FURRY QUEIRZ! DEY TUK ER JERBS!!!!!!
whf, on 18 December 2010 - 06:29 AM, said:
I haven't gone on IRC in a while, maybe I should go back..... nah.
The power in my home just came back on, it was off for a few hours, so now I'm going to be replying to everyone, ya know, like I do.
This post has been edited by kekon: 18 December 2010 - 10:18 AM
- #50
- 18 December 2010 - 10:20 AM












