SushiJaguar, on 19 January 2011 - 03:33 AM, said:
"What if the underage person has a body built for sex, can have children, is mature enough?"
Not really full of exceptions. This is a hypothetical argument and would likely never come up in the real world. It's biologically impossible for someone underage for sex to be developed enough.This is considering I judge underage as not having hit puberty, so somewhere around fourteen.
Well, your definition of underage is not the same as what we're discussing ^_^
Anyways, yeah, it would be hard, but it could happen, though.
Actually, I think this conversation is
the definition of underage, so, my bad =P
SushiJaguar, on 19 January 2011 - 03:40 AM, said:
That's a decidedly neutral post. I feel sorry for you, 'cause it's inevitable that eventually, you'll have to abandon neutrality.
Who are you talking to, Mr. Sushi?
That's why it's theoretical ^_^
Though I can visualize that happening, like, finding the right questions suitable for everyone and putting them to a automatic test or something...
My post's been appended!?
What sorcery is this? I posted using the Full Editor while I had the last post, and it automatically appended my answers ^_^
I didn't know that happened
Way to go, Mr. SuitCase!
This post has been edited by Lycan: 19 January 2011 - 03:52 AM