DritchJaul, on 18 March 2011 - 02:56 AM, said:
For the most part I agree with Dr. Klaus, but you are doing really well with shape and the face. The shape is very defined, and the perspective is clear, and doesn't seem to change throughout the drawing, even though the right (relative) arm kinda kills that. Like you said, your proportions are off, not length but thickness. Unlike what you said, in this picture your hands and feet are actually exemplary; it would take me hours of drawing and erasing to get feet like that. That is not to say they are without imperfection, again their thickness is off, but that's proportions. Keep at it, and like Klaus said, practice!
P.S. I like the scratchy-sketchy look; but it would look better without the colored in areas, just a heads up.
Thank you for the complament on the shape and how it's defined, it means a lot to hear something positive! I'm glad the perspective is clear though I agree completely that the right arm is off and kills it. I'm glad you think the hands and feet are at least somewhat good, though again the thickness-I agree-is off.
I'm glad I'm not the only one that does enjoy the scratchy-sketchy look from time to time! But I get what you mean on the colored in parts...I just felt weird not coloring them in...originally she wasn't going to have spots, but I just decided to try putting some on her. I liked the one spot and it just grew from there. I think one or two less would be good...I think my main one that I don't like is the giant one on her shoulder. If it was smaller it might be better...but I'm unsure of that.
Next time I'll draw multiple versions of her: without spots, with spots that aren't colored in, and with colored in spots. Maybe if the art is cleaned up the spots will look better! ^_^ Anyways thanks again for you're input, it means a bunch!