Yeah, it was unimportant.XD Looks cleaner now, imo.
Then daisy realized she was on stage.
ah gahd, I'm in love with your method of coloring. It seems like it's watercolors except it's wayyy too neat
That tail seems to be raised pretty damn high, Daisy.
And Sandy's doing the la-la-la prance...XD
And agreed, awesome colouring.
Daisy's mouth and chin seem pretty off in panel 3
Shoop da whoop
This is beautiful, but shouldn't Daisy be a bit yellower? I thought it was Sandy's new friend that looks a lot like daisy but brown.
Found her http://www.bittersweetcandybowl.com/c58/p6.html
@Sparkfur Why do you choose to point out the tiniest flaw but not the very apparent great things in this wonderful drawing? :L You aren't being very helpful.
Anyway, this is soooo great. The coloring is unique and I love Daisy's fur/hair. I also like her expression in panel 1. Keep up this good work !
Pointing out tiny flaws are the best because a lot of people will miss those, and if no one points it out, you can't improve on those mistakes. So do not belittle meeps's efforts.
'Sandy' turns around, and it turns out it's Mick Jagger.
I dunno why, that just popped into my head.
@Radial: Umm... what? That was directed at Sparkfur, not meep. He at least pointed out the good thing about this. There is nothing wrong with his comment. It just bothered me how something so awesome like this was 'belittled' by someone pointing out a tiny flaw and not saying anything good about it.
This looks like claymation in the thumbnail
Comment ID #50269
Scratched the idea of text for the first three panels? o.o
Blue_Sly on July 3, 2012.